kleener

I don't understand why it is considered "boasting" to declare your riches but it isn't considered "boasting" to declare your artifice, programming & knowledge(aka stealing an account via phishing/trojanetc./knowingabout things like café etc.) Let me try flaming post #2 using his own ideology. ZOMFG!!!111 I KNOW SO MUCH ABOUT CHARISMA THAT I ASK 7 YEAR OLDS FOR THEIR ACCOUNT INFO LOLOL AND GET SO MANY ACCOUNTS BECAUSE I’M SO CLEVER KKK?? Notice how I am playing off his “bragging” of his “skills” just as he played off post #1s “bragging” of his “wealth” Actually, he wasn’t bragging just as you weren’t. You are just being an obtrusive asshole for your own sadistic fun, but you did the same thing that he did – just talk. The creator of this forum doesn’t give a half shit of if you know he is rich or not nor did he state he was. He was just trying to be social with a group of people that can share his strife and see how they deal with certain issues. Myg0t hacks. He hacks. Hackers sometimes get banned. He gets banned. He is curious of how myg0t might potentially deal with their ban. You flame him. "steal another account edit** noone here cares your rich, you cant prove it so all we know is that you are trying to make yourself look cool on the internet." The same would be as if I said, "buy another account edit** noone here cares your knowledgable about how to steal an account. you can't prove it and for all we know you are trying to make yourself look cool on the internet." And wow. All myg0ts should know that they do this kind of nonsense all the time I was just a little tired of it today. People label you "immature" all the time. To me, someone who is immature is only stupid, ignorant, or both. When you see people like #2 post using retarded fallacies that means they are ignorant and possibily stupid which in turn leads to the label "immature" Your behaviors are all signs of some common psychological problems. let me name some: sadism masochism sadomasochism inferiority complex superiority complex etc. that coupled with fallacies is a dangerious combination to average people, the ones you "rage" so much which is a fallacy in itself. The reason it is a fallacy is it can be used anywhere and once you use it you think you've automatically won your argument. and your retarded obstinance, which you think is clever, is just annoying because it shows how stupid you are. Here is your reasoning: A presents arguemtn B. A is "raged" therefore B is wrong. Example: John: aren't you mean for doing this? Mygot: you're saying that because you've been raged!!! john:that doesn't stop my contention as you still callous. Raged is just a fallacy that is easily accessible by most average people and easily used against average people. It's almost like a "cult" Now then, tell me i've been raged so you can heal the wounds i have caused in exposing your psyche but remember it won't work on me considering i've literally never ran into a myg0t in any pub - also considering i play competitively meaning they can't rage me unless they started hacking private server passwords in which case an admin is always near(to initiate the lo3) and will ban you for disrupting anyway. Anyone can use illogical arguments. I am assuming you are also pseudo-intellectuals which means that these really grind your gears because in essence you are too stupid to coutneract any kind of fallacy - the kinds you use everyday. you will only counteract them with more fallacies in which case a more intellectual perosn will obliterate them. ok let me do one: If you do not respond to this message i automatically won this argument, understand? I'm sure you can understand why that is a fallacy as that "logical" statement doesn't make any sense. a says b and c says nothing so b is true? nope. example: i say this stuff about mygot members and mygot members say nothing. is it true? well it could be and it might not be as the given information means you cannot extrapolate any information. ps disregard my poor grammar and spelling tonight as it is late and i'm getting ready to retire. pz and night everyone i'll be tomorrow. Back. Good! No one has had enough brains to come back with anything. The least I would expect was some kind of dirty link or the "dangerous" *******. Please, try to rage me so you can disregard all my logic in your own little fallacious world be on your way. Oh and yeah. According to MY fallacy, I'm winning this battle (Please understand that this is not truly my argument but just a parody of how most myg0ts idiotically use these specious whims – while all conceive only the ignorant spread the word )

Well, the fact that you do not even know what I think you think means you cannot judge this. I think, as of now, that you want all people who do not speak a language fluently to be deported immediantly - legal or illegal immigrant. Philosophy has already classified right and wrong and that was the point of the first sentence. I am not saying what is "right and wrong" per se rather i am saying what is immoral and not. that IS immoral but might still be right. I am not saying if it is right or wrong but it is immoral. Also, I would like for you to restate your opinion in a clearer fashion. The fact that someone can change and learn English easily makes a situation where you ask yourself "why should i deportsomeone if they dedicate their time to change?" With that, if laws were placed in to make people speak English your vision would be acceptable. Right now, I think you are working of racial/cultural tension which is wrong(immoral).

Thinkers have thought for a long time. They have thought about the nature of man and what is right or wrong. Your view(or the view that i think you believe as i am not sure) is wrong and you must deal with it or be ignorant. Also, what part of talking about something limits the use of arguments as they use language? Try explaining your stance a little more. I am not even aware of your true stance. Are illegal Mexicans who speak English fluenty allowed? Illegals that do? What if those two do but with an accent is that ok? Is it ok if a legal Mexican only speaks Spanish? What about an illegal? What about any other kind of person who speaks another language? Your view is too limited as it is now leaving people to extrapolate which leaves to Tu Quoque. Just state your opinion in a clearer way.

Placate does not work there. Also, this has nothing to do with boosting their egos or tempering them but lowering yours. The fact that all myg0ts partook in this "degrading" makes the newbies form a sense of trust and more easily manipulated into joining/doing stupid things that make the myg0ts laugh at them. It simply makes people feel like they are joining something important akin to the beating when you join a gang. It is a common manipulation technique used with any kind of cult where, usually, the top guy uses your trust in a bad way.

That means nothing. I don't know if i could even blindly trust you. Your ignorance is too high. "your queer" "you're queer" Would you like to say something meaningful now? If you cannot even argue regular points how can you argue your debauchery?

Why should he die? Define stupid.

No. We speak a foreign language so that Americans can be highly cultured and not stupid. The fact that some people choose to learn Spanish is their choice. I know a high school that serves French, Spanish, Russian, German, and Latin. That is the first fault in your contention - the fact that we arne't forced to learn Spanish. If you are talking about "press 1/2" then that is the businesses choice and even if a native language was forced by law it would not be illegal to do this and people would still do it just to get more customers and more money.Every person from Mexico I know speaks English, too. They usually take English as a second language/start taking remidial/cp/ap classes eventually. I am not here to argue for or against native language laws but some people need to stop making bad arguments and think out their ideas. On the other hand, the Spanish have been talking about the reinvasion of their lost land i.e. Texas ,New Mexico and California by not assimilating to American culture.

our views are fine it is only the way you present them that is bad. Supporting a law to make all standard things in America English, like drivers license tests, SATs, ACTs, Street signs, etc. is nothing bad but could be argued against. Saying deport for people who don't speak is bad. If that law talked above were passed it would effectively force everyone to learn English to the point to take the SATs/drivers test or they couldn't do anything. And please, stop using ad hominems. Does your animosity also carry over to people with accents? If so, how far? country accents? Foreign accents? Lisps? What else? Where can you draw a line without just being illogical? You are saying that if you don't speak the language gtfo. Better worded it would be "we should make a law that makes english required; it is up to them to learn it and if they don't they will soon fail and have to leave, anyway" Also, you might be looking at this is a narrow-minded point-of-view. Imagine this: A surpluss of Mexicans cross the border and there are no more bad jobs that intelligent people do not want anyway. Desperate, these Mexican immigrants work for little to none and clean your house/become your personal maid. That is just one possibility that I can pull out of how they could benifit people. Do I support a native language? maybe. Do i support not having one? Maybe. I will not disclose my position as I am not here to argue my stance but to allow you to argue yours. Besides that, it is a common fact that people from The Netherlands learn numerous languages, including English, usually. Even if you supported "deportation of all non-English speakers" that would rarely apply to Dutch people so it doesn't even belong here.

Why are you saying other people aren't smart when you misused a word learned in ~3rd grade? That is too much.

No. You are telling him he is gay and then you are telling him to leave. I told you to be honest not to be rude and stereotypical. Stereotypes of any kind are just illogical statements that make you look ignorant. Please, next time just be blunt so you can spare yourself the label of "ignorant" Here is an example retort: We at myg0t do not enjoy trying to infect eachother with viruses so please refrain from doing so or please leave. Just so you know, you already lost my trust.(this will show him that his action have repercussions - little or big. it is up for him to infer that one example could speak for many and that he should stop or tarnish his record) Later, you can question his obsession with trying to hurt people. Is he doing it because you guys hurt him; is it retribution? Is he doing it for "Two Wrongs Make a Right fallacy"? In which case inform him of his illogical fallacies so he can change. If no one was ever told of their ignorance everyone would still be like they were when they were five(ignorant and thinking they know everything) why should this guy never be enlightened? Just tell him so he has a chance to change too as it isn't fair that only you did.

Why?

While there is nothing wrong with supporting a national language to be obligatory and be a standard in America - standard for all tests and high schools - there is something particularly wrong with wanting to deport random people because of their culture.

You call him a bitch when you instigated the entire ordeal? You tried to be exasperating so he messed your configuration up so you couldn't harass anyone on his server - a clear case of retribution - and you feel it is necessary to harass him even more. How unscrupulous. Be ashamed. Extreme example to show you your problem: A man kills his wife who did nothing. The bitch police arrest him. Since the man thought the police were being bitches he breaks out and murders the wives of the cops who arrested him and the 2 judges who convicted him, one in the beginning and one during the appeal. How terrible. The pubbers did nothing to you - the wives. You still murder them; analagous to the annoyance. The admin is merely showing justice and retribution by disabling your ability- judges & cops "arresting" the murderer so he can't murder anymore or "disabling your mic aka weapon so you can't annoy anymore" You attack him even though what he did was correct - you, the murderer, kill more than ever. you no longer just joined the pub for 1 day for fun(1 murder) you are specifically trying to destroy him and harm that ONE GUY (aka killing HIS wife/destroying his server atmosphere) which is unjust and terrible. He did the right thing and you are striking back at him. You have no idea how nice or mean this guy could have been. You have no idea what he has just been through. You are ignorant. Just think about what you are doing.

Why are you insulting him? Ad Hominems do not do anything. You even conjoin the actions of a miscellaneous group with trying to do badly. It is possible that he is doing this for retribution; if this is the case it is impartial. If he is doing it for the sake of a "Two Wrongs Make a Right" fallacy then he is just ignorant. In any case, the conclusion underlies that another fallacy will not make him change his fallacious ways so just be candid.

I expect humanity.

That doesn't stop the fact that it is a manipulators’ action. The beginning myg0ts probably even did it to develop trust.

The baking of the cake is obviously a manipulation technique. Whoever founded this group was either naturally good at manipulation(i.e. charismatic - aka being good at something and not knowing you are. Someone can use common manipulation technique and not even realize their premise) or a smart person who invisioned a cult/society that he could easiliy command.

Then the meaning has nothing to do with you and to do with him.

I would never surmise you have money nor include clues for you to infer it. Additionally, I am not unerringly clear on what your vague remark means. I thought you were saying 500$ was a low allowance for an unemployed adolescent and comparing the families income to that of a person living in China. The relevance I saw was this: I made a reference number for an allowance some kids might get making them more prone to shop lifting and stated they were supported by their family only and not a job. You say something talking about sweatshops. Instead of comparing the comment with the kid i compared it to the parent as in my writings they were the main provider and thus provide for the kid so i couldn't see why you would randomly talk about the kid partaking in sweatshop work. It was all just a large misunderstanding. Especially since we are talking about American teenagers shoplifting and not Asians. It just seemed off-topic.

Enjoy the pain of others? Why does the quantity of sufferance change the main idea? Clearly, you, and if not you some people here, like to irritate and infuriate people and cause the pain. Why don't you take it a step farther and kidnap a child and kill him and torture him psychologically and physically before the demise. Oh wait, that would cross the line. You are already crossing the line.

I know extremely rich families with small children to anywhere around 18 year old children that get nary money from their parents. It all depends on the style of their parents. Yes, some people get about 500$ and others get thousands. It varies. When you were 12 years old did your mom hand out 100$ bills to you? That's nice. In case you didn't know, I am talking about people not capable of getting jobs and DEPENDENT on their parents.Since the money is dependent on the parents the amount he receives has no relevance to the wealth of the family. The fact that you brought up income amounts is ridiculous. Imagine it like this: a man who makes large amounts of money hates his son so gives him no money. Does that mean the family is poor? No. a man who makes mediocre amounts of money and loves his child giving him 10%(~5,000$ in todays inflation) of his income. Does this make that family rich? No. A son gets 10000 a year from his dad for his birthday. i challenge you to find out his dads income. It is impossible, obviously, which means you shouldn't profess anything about theoretical money amounts as they do not have anything to do with this argument. Please, stop being ignorant and think about what you are saying.

I don't understand why you feel it is necessary to degrade anyone like this. It is just rude and aberrant. No one said he was a good person, but if you acknowledge Satan’s existence then you acknowledge God’s. From this, you are being too overconfident in your alleged knowledge when only God can make a judgment and elucidate why. This is all using your reasoning; of course, I do not officially stand by anything on this forum as personal life is not needed here. For your sake, I just hope your God is merciful in your sin.

I hate most people here for being stupid, ignorant, or both. fallacious arguments permeate this entire society.

What is wrong with you?

Well, I would presume some people here are <15 years old and cannot get a job. That would mean that their money amount depends on their family and some people only get ~500$ a year so they can't purchase games like that. Besides, I know someone who is very opulant but still steals tictacs from our school store that cost 25 cents... not sure why though. There must be some sort of rush associated that you've never experienced if they are willing to steal and you are willing to pay not to steal. For me, stealing is transgressive and stupid so i do not do it.