myg0tDKay

the one to keep you awake kinda works, didn't sleep for 72hours one time, started hallucinating and couldn't keep myself awake (even cold water on my face wouldn't do shit, but this works) maybe it was psychological but meh. The one for lucid dreaming didn't do shit for me though And you don't need a fucking iPod, i tried this shit a long time ago, i think it was before iPods, i just burned the .wavs i generated on a cd and used a random cd player w/ headset

Is this website for retards ? GOOD STUFF IN, BAD STUFF OUT, DURRRR

hahaha, fucking stupid relationships are unstable while tattoos are almost permanent

http://www.utorrent.com minimalistic, fast, pretty complete, compatible with azarius and bitcomet, and NOT CODED IN FUCKING RESSOURCE-WHORE-JAVA

I started working out because of a back problem, and now I'm extending it to the whole body, tired of these chicken arms. I do 150 abs, some weight lifting and run about 1km every week, it's not a lot but that's a start, muscles are popping out teehee

You're telling me facts, and calling them the truth ? You're making an assumption as you can't prove me the link between the two Even so, anything can be the superior of anything else No as being the best country could mean anything, and is potentially any country I never said all words are subjective, i clearly stated that there are words belonging to the sensible world, while others belong the intelligible one. Can you picture an idea ? Do you know what does it looks like ? It isnt intelligible and thus, is sensible, and subject to change at any time, and cannot have a real definition. We just accepted one to be able to communicate with each other, it doesn't make it true Just because we agree on it doesn't make it true, since it only holds on faith and/or beliefs Then again, as i predicted, you cannot define better without using other words that needs to be defined. What does excelling all others mean ? You just used the word best in your definition of better, way to go dumbfuck What does most productive of good means ? Opposing* You're making assumptions again Anything is possible, you can't predict the outcome of a fight, the Marine could have slipped off the concrete and died without any retards touching him at all, this wont make the concrete better. Your obvious patriotism has clearly made you narrow-minded, but I understand you, it feels comfortable to have fixed opinions To settle this: Mathematics are perfectly objective, but their fundations aren't. For example Einstein proved that the geometry we use is not the "true" one, or the "good" one, his research on the relativity theory made him use a time-space continuum noone could ever draw, as it was so beyond anybody's comprehension. BUT in the end, he came up with something real, concrete, that works, OBJECTIVE Also, i won't argue the fact that your military could kill more people than others, as there may be facts to prove this, and whenever i believe or not, this would still be true. However why would you associate this with being the "best" army ? Maybe the best army is the one who gets the less blood spilled ? Then again, the link between killing people and being the best, is impossible to prove What Is Objective Reality? Objective reality is whatever remains true whether you believe in it or not. If you have to believe it to make it true, then you're fooling yourself. If you can't convince someone that it is true, you're fooling yourself. To know what country is the best, you have to think about it, get proofs, and facts, and ultimately believe it, you're just assuming it is true because you believe it is. What's objective then ? The fact that all human beings live and die for example. You don't need to believe it, bring up facts or arguments, you just know it. And if you choose not to believe it, it'll catch up with you sooner or later, and you'll be reminded that you were wrong the day that you die. How can you have the definite proof that America is best ? By bombing the shit out of other countries ? Just because the samurais were all killed doesn't mean they were not any better than their opponents, as for this particular situation, better could mean, for me, with more courage and honor Why do people have morals ? Because they have different notions of what's good and bad. And since better is a superlative of good, it's definition will also vary, and it isn't something you can force into other people's mind, just like people don't like to be told what's good or bad. I truly hope you don't think morals are decided by the majority, but rather is something intuitive, and a personnal choice. Whenever it is influenced by the current society or not is not important, you still made your own choices. When you tell me what is good or bad, you ask me not to think about it. When you tell me that the United States is the best country, you're not giving me the choice to think about it. You'll never be able to prove me wrong, and stop worshipping, and sacralising a country, you'll never even come close to know what wisdom is.

this thread is a rifk ideas cannot be defined as a whole objects stay true through time, but the definition of their idea, constantly evolves, as it is an idea better is part of the sensible world, as it isnt intelligible, and then has no objective definition, as you said using your own words better means "relatively true" and then could mean anything

No counter arguments, no proofs, i win, ha ha ha !

No, an atom will stay consistent through times, and whatever words we use to define it, it will remain true to itself You're giving me the definition of your idea of an atom, not the atom itself The idea we have of an object constantly evolves, as we find more precise ways to define it Don't bring up shit excuses like "i'm playing WC3", do you really think im sitting there anxiously waiting for your next breath, you're a great entertainment while i'm traveling through eve online

In the past, people believed the Earth was flat, and they accepted it as being the truth. They were proven wrong, and we now see them as being ignorant and foolish (which you must be, to think you know the truth about something you can't prove) The fact that most people believe that the definition is true, doesn't make it the truth, once again. It's like today's metaphysics, you can only make assumptions about what you don't see. Majority can only agree to accept an assumption, not make it the truth

Why wouldn't there be other definitions ? Just because the definition of "better military" seems the same for most people, doesn't mean it is for everybody. The only things you can define, are those who are part of the objective reality. An atom is an atom, and it's definition is the truth (however the idea of an atom can vary from one person to another, and there is no definition of the idea of an atom, is there). Things that are part of the sensible worlds cannot be defined as they are ONLY ideas. Can you define beautiful for example ? Ideas are non substantial, you just have accepted a definition of better because it is more confortable for your small brain, just like people have accepted a particular definition of the world beautiful and thus, have different standards "id hit it" "i wouldnt"

Define better military, better economy, and so on. From someone else's point of view, better military could mean more skilled, or bigger, or with soldiers who have more powerful weapons, or with more experienced commanders, or with soldiers who can drink horse cum faster, (in which case we are better, teehee, i anticipated your joke) No, you're just interpreting it your own way, but it cannot be used otherwise, as it cannot be defined, just like i said You lose

Everything can be defined better than everything else, therefore america can be defined as the best country, whereas any other country could be defined as the best, which is absurd Better belongs to the sensible world and not the intelligible world, "We're better than.." is inappropriate, whereas "I find this country better than" may be the truth, you're the one being hypocritical, I consider I won Well shit, no problem, it's not often i get to argue with chinese people about philosophy Some closing words : Socrates said "I know I am intelligent, because I know that I know nothing", only argue on things you think are the truth. If you really believe you know everything *WINK NWA*, you in fact, are ignorant

good argument based on strong facts, i have so been proven wrong

Basically, it's about the retard killing the person you respect the most. Since you think better means stronger, then the retard wouldn't be better than the other guy. You said that if the retard outsmartered and overpowered the other person, then he indeed is better, but then better means something else, it means smarter and stronger. You've already proven the fact that better could mean 2 different things, and isn't part of the objective reality, but is rather something intuitive, and has a different definition (if any) for different people, different cultures, different times, etc I gave you a counter example to illustrate this : What if the retard kills the other person by outsmarting, let's say, his friends, and there was nothing he could do about it ? PS : Knowledge : Points of unified reality in the mind. Truth : The communicated representation of unified reality. "We're better because.. " =/= truth as it isnt unified reality.

Oh oui, tiens, plein de foutre dans ta gueule !!! <3

Prove me wrong You wouldn't know what i'm talking about if you couldn't understand it, you obviously just can't prove me wrong 是 是 ?

What if I edited a dot ? I would have made it more clear while it still was easy to guess

Edited, wasn't hard to guess what i meant though I've reached the limit of the asian brain, i'm quite proud actually go read something that's actually going to make you think like descartes' theory about objective reality, instead of wondering how your country may be "better" than anything else

What if it has nothing to do with being smart or overpowered, but is more likely due to other people's fault ? It would only prove that the retard outsmarted the people who got this person killed, but this wouldn't even mean he's better than them, because as i said before, the correlation between "better" and "smarter" doesn't objectively exist

If the most advanced is the best http://www.hemmings.com/images/editorial/1979-Saab-900.jpg is better than http://www.peterrenn.clara.net/bentley.jpg Sometimes, you define "best" in terms of looks, or about anything, it is a subjective idea, stop trying Your name suits you well

Let's pretend that a retard kills the person you like the most, is the retard "better" ?