myg0tDannyDong

Ugly as shit.

The ninth circle of hell was freezing cold in dante's inferno http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9th_circle_of_hell#The_Circles_of_Hell fail.

remakes are gay

Plus, not everyone who goes to art school gets some faggot painting/drawing degree. I'm going for Visual Special Effects, which is one of the most lucrative art-related fields.

I would murder CJ for not including me in the poll. However, in lieu of this... I would murder SX, because you gotta aim high.

Never been caught. Also LOCK YOUR DOOR, RETARD!

Currently full time student. Studying to be a Visual Effects artist for cinema and games.

Seen this posted countless times on slashdot.

I see no rage here. 0/10

You can't patent artwork.

corps    /kɔr, koʊr/ 1. Military. a. a military organization consisting of officers and enlisted personnel or of officers alone: the U.S. Marine Corps; corps of cadets. b. a military unit of ground combat forces consisting of two or more divisions and other troops. 2. a group of persons associated or acting together: the diplomatic corps; the press corps. 3. Printing. a Continental designation that, preceded by a number, indicates size of type in Didot points of 0.0148 in. (3.8 mm): 14 corps. core 1   /kɔr, koʊr/ –noun 1. the central part of a fleshy fruit, containing the seeds. 2. the central, innermost, or most essential part of anything. 3. Also called magnetic core. Electricity. the piece of iron, bundle of iron wires, or other ferrous material forming the central or inner portion in an electromagnet, induction coil, transformer, or the like. 4. (in mining, geology, etc.) a cylindrical sample of earth, mineral, or rock extracted from the ground by means of a corer so that the strata are undisturbed in the sample. 5. the inside wood of a tree. 6. Anthropology. a lump of stone, as flint, from which prehistoric humans struck flakes in order to make tools. Compare flake tool. 7. Carpentry. a. a thickness of wood forming a base for a veneer. b. a wooden construction, as in a door, forming a backing for veneers. 8. Engineering. kern 2 . 9. Metallurgy. a. a thickness of base metal beneath a cladding. b. the softer interior of a piece of casehardened metal. c. a specially formed refractory object inserted into a mold to produce cavities or depressions in the casting that cannot be readily formed on the pattern. 10. Geology. the central portion of the earth, having a radius of about 2100 mi. (3379 km) and believed to be composed mainly of iron and nickel in a molten state. Compare crust (def. 6), mantle (def. 3). 11. Also called reactor core. Physics. the region in a reactor that contains its fissionable material. 12. Also called magnetic core. Computers. a small ring or loop of ferromagnetic material with two states of polarization that can be changed by changing the direction of the current applied in wires wound around the ring, used to store one bit of information or to perform switching or logical functions. 13. Ropemaking. heart (def. 16). 14. Phonetics. the final segment of a syllable beginning with the vowel and including any following consonants; the nucleus plus the coda. Compare onset (def. 3). –verb (used with object) 15. to remove the core of (fruit). 16. to cut from the central part. 17. to remove (a cylindrical sample) from the interior, as of the earth or a tree trunk: to core the ocean bottom. 18. to form a cavity in (a molded object) by placing a core, as of sand, in the mold before pouring.

$300 (collectively) and a Garmin Nuvi 750 GPS

Do dead people, animals, or dead animals count?

All of these + Letters From Iwo Jima

They're both shitty TN (twisted nematic) panels.

Laziness is no excuse, and Illustrator's main tool is the pen tool.

Why are you using Photoshop and not Illustrator for vector work?

Same I think almost all holidays are stupid, anyway. The only holidays I don't think are stupid are birthdays, since it is the celebration of the existence of a human being.

That's a complete ripoff. I was able to build a rendering workstation with 8GB of Fully Buffered (the expensive server kind) RAM, Tyan Server Motherboard (Tempest i5000PW (S5382)), a GeForce 8800 GT, Creative X-Fi Soundcard, 750W PC Power and Cooling Power Supply, three 500GB Hard Drives, and 2x Quad Core Xeon processors for only slightly more than that... over a year ago.

Saw pwned.nl and thought it was hilarious, I checked out the myg0t website and got into raging. My first rage experience was in Splinter Cell: Chaos Theory Multiplayer.

Hip-Hop is for niggers.

Humans evolved as omnivores. To completely remove a part of a diet is, by definition, unhealthy. Try to raise a dog or cat on only vegetables.

These reporters seem to be confused between the constant of 'c' (which we call the speed of light, in simplistic terms) and the speed of the phase of light waves in in a vacuum. In short, no single particle in the experiment moved faster than c. In layman's terms, it's like having a line of push buttons every 1/4 mile. The fastest human can travel about 15 miles per hour. So lets say you wanted each button pressed in sequence. You could send a single person running down and press each one sequentially, or you could line up a person in front of each button, and then have each one press the button one second after each other. The problem is, that you have to run each person out their button before they can be pressed. However, as soon as that is done, they can press their buttons within 1 second of each other. So as far as the person monitoring the pressing of the buttons, it appears the same as if a single person was speeding along at 900 miles per hour, even though no person ever traveled faster than 15 miles per hour. And the setup for such an event to occur takes the same amount of time or longer to complete than if you just sent a single person in the first place, so no useful information traveled faster than the fastest speed allowed by nature. This is exactly what happened in the experiment. No physical laws were broken. It was just a pretty neat trick with light waves. Thus far, no experiment has outright disproven general relativity. In fact, it has recently been proven that subatomic particles obey e=mc^2 http://www.theage.com.au/news/technology/quarks-gluons-and-corroborating-emc2/2008/11/21/1226770694126.html Classical mechanics = Newtonian physics, not relativistic physics. As a further note, neither General Relativity nor Quantum Mechanics work completely together. Quantum mechanics breaks down when you try to quantify gravity, or move it beyond the realm of the very small. Likewise, General Relativity behaves very nicely at medium, large, and super large scales, but becomes unwieldy at very small scales. They are still both very useful tools in predicting the natural behavior of objects in the universe, but both will have to give way to a unified theory that can successfully combine both the features of GR and QM in a way that yields predictable results. String theory is one such effort to unify GR and QM, but it presents no way to experimentally prove or disprove it, so many scientists in the field don't take it seriously, since the foundation of science is based on proof through experiment. EDIT: By the way, the word choice for the poll is very poor. Science is not based on belief, like religion. It is based on experiment and evidence. Science does not change based on belief. The ultimate goal of science is to predict and explain universal phenomenon through tested and documented theory.

Aww, I was going to post this until I saw you did it.