DavidOfTheEast

Surprise! You can't fucking spell for shit! At this point your posts only deem it necessary for me to reply with spam and random images as you have the intelligence of a nigger with Fetal Alcohol Syndrome. http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v224/SadLittleBoi/god.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v224/SadLittleBoi/wtflol.gif http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v224/SadLittleBoi/gay.jpg

Dear Cock Smoker, You suck Cock. Love, The Non-Cock Smokers

That doesnt mean sexual RP is 'cyber rape.' 'Cyber rape' would only be accountable when a person is attempting to meet up with another person in real life with the intent to rape them or commit a sexual crime against that person. No you are not breaking the law.

First of all, the website you posted is speculative and biased. There are no facts, no references, not even a fucking precedent. Secondly, your use of Google and understanding the law is a FAILURE.

There is no such thing as 'cyber rape.' This looks like a scare tactic from a school website to prohibit sexual conduct through the Internet with unsuspecting strangers. A lot of naive teenagers and even children will go into chat rooms and talk with people who are sociopaths or pedophiles. The whole 'cyber rape' issue is just there to scare the living crap out of curious teenagers or sick, sexual adults preying on children.

You forgot Motorhead's "Born to Raise Hell." :cryd:

We need good ol' fashioned patriarchy again. Damn liberal Americans...

I Lol'ed.

Yes. In fact if you hit a person hard enough on the forehead or directly on the back of the head you can make 'em go blind.

I dont see why everyone is startled at this. The only time I ever got contacted for suspicious activity was when I was using AOL and raged somebody in a chat room (about six years ago.) Since I have used AIM nothing has ever been wrong nor have I ever been contacted about anything. I still trade porn, mp3s, movies, etc., and nothing is going to happen to me. Do you know why? Because, like someone said earlier, no service has the manpower to observe every single fucking thing you do on AIM. With that said, if you are still raged by this company's policy then use a different chat program.

But thats the whole point. It is only the grafitti community that will "embrace" other artists. That does not mean its going to be accepted by the skateboarder or the wigger or any other community. Not everyone is into the grafitti hobby. I do agree that the concept of being on someone's 'turf' is idiotic. The only way I would justify that the grafitti artists was on their turf if the grafitti guy was either on their block, marking up one of their houses, or a business that either their parents or friends owned.

Nah, the best war film in my opinion is Patton. Edit: And Full Metal Jacket.

Hillarious. :bowrofl:

Corrupt file for me = no listen. :(

Good comic. I like it.

No it is interesting, but beta testing always has a catch and businesses usually put a copywrite warning when agreeing to the terms of service while using the game.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v224/SadLittleBoi/penor.jpg

There's a fine line between free speech and using free speech to preach hateful ideas. He could have been sued and I am surprised he wasn't. America is a litigious country. You see lawsuits running rampant all the time over the most silly shit.

http://www.dontbewillful.com/misc/glindaboobs.jpg

And now that your rage is gone, let's all jump on the bandwagon and hump a blue rubber ball! http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v224/SadLittleBoi/wtflol.gif

Here's a fun prank: Blindfold a white friend and take him to the ghetto.

I come back from the bar to see this shit still being argued? TheHatter is right that the incident reflects a specific person, but it is the likelihood of using your first Amendment rights to defamate another person or group of people that is presented. You have a right to speech just like you have a right to be free from defamation or libel. If someone is calling you a "nigger," "spic," "gook," etc and you do not like it, regardless of what form of communication it is interpreted in, then you have a right to file charges against the offender. Neither is a newspaper but libel extends its branch through there. Look, the term "place" is ambiguous. It also represents the medium of communication where the use of speech is being used. If I call you up on a phone and call your mother a "sandnigger," that is defamation. If I write in a newspaper article that you are a homosexual, that is libel. If I type up on the Internet in public chat that Chunkylover56 is a Jewbag, that is libel and harassment since it is real time. Point being: you invaded a private chat room with the pre-meditation of causing harm and did so by using profane language. There was intent and cause of harm, hence it is against the law. :drool:

Already did. That is the procedure. Oh, so you want a precedent? Why didnt you say so? :sackrider Here, research Blumenthal v. Drudge, 992 F. Supp. 44 (D.D.C. 1998). Edit: TheHatter --> You, sir, are raged. :ownedd:

I hear the punishment is much worse on your side of the world versus America. :no: