Posted January 24, 200619 yr Here's my latest signature: http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/6598/lyricalgsignature599wy.jpg
January 25, 200619 yr Not too bad, but it just looks bland if you know what I mean. It would look good if it was a bit more vibrant.
January 25, 200619 yr you guys are too nice to say it fucken sucks. 1. it's too small 2. usually anyone can make parameters that small look superb but you fail
January 25, 200619 yr Author you guys are too nice to say it fucken sucks. 1. it's too small 2. usually anyone can make parameters that small look superb but you fail LoL, thats unfair grounds to give a comment like that, all that is wrong with it is the size? I assure you, you will not see a signature made by me under the parameters of 400x100. Anything bigger looks awfull in my opinion. Do you really dislike the effect, or are you just being an asshole...
January 25, 200619 yr LoL, thats unfair grounds to give a comment like that, all that is wrong with it is the size? I assure you, you will not see a signature made by me under the parameters of 400x100. Anything bigger looks awfull in my opinion. Do you really dislike the effect, or are you just being an asshole... hi my name is lyrical g i have a vagina on my face.
January 25, 200619 yr LoL, thats unfair grounds to give a comment like that, all that is wrong with it is the size? I assure you, you will not see a signature made by me under the parameters of 400x100. Anything bigger looks awfull in my opinion. Do you really dislike the effect, or are you just being an asshole... hes a forum troll , excuse him. Ill buttslap him when I get home for you k ?
January 27, 200619 yr you guys are too nice to say it fucken sucks. 1. it's too small 2. usually anyone can make parameters that small look superb but you fail i find that pretty funny when all u did was take ur sig from a website. gfg
