Someone please just answer my question, is this guy inbred or is it just bad luck.

No, I said he is sucking it because he is. Look closely. I think you're the one with the tendancies.. I said nothing about gayness or anal sex. You did.

 

I was giving a theory about your psyche. Of course someone with a single digit IQ, like yourself, couldn't realize that. This is shown by your lame rebuttle, "No... I think you're the one with the tendancies..." Good job at showing everyone you're a moron.

 

As far as sucking a cake, only someone infatuated with homosexuality would make that assumption. At examining closely, it appears he is simply holding his mouth open and holding a piece of cake up to it. His cheeks do not show that he is applying suction to anything. The only thing you can see is that he's keeping his mouth open so it appears he's eating the cake (or possibly actually eating it). Clearly not sucking the cake.

 

I can't wait until you grow up from your infatuation with all things gay.

 

EDIT: I also like the fact how you circumvented my entire statement about you trying to flame him and failing. Apparently failing at something is more embarrassing for you to bring up, or else you would have defended it. However, had you done that, you would have thought that I would have said "You didn't defend my acquisition of you being gay, so you must be gay." Therefore you found it more important do defend further attacks on your sexuality, rather than of your originality. This makes me believe you are more concerned what people think about your sexuality than your intelligence. This is probably due to the fact you ARE, indeed, gay and don't want people to know. In fact, you'd rather people think you're a moron--which, of course, we all now do--than think you're gay.

 

EDIT 2: The inverse could have been true, as well. You felt the need to defend your sexuality because you may not be gay--you're surely obsessed with it though, as we can tell, but it is probably due to your young age--but you didn't feel the need to defend your intelligence because you're are stupid.

 

EDIT 3: Before you even TRY to defend yourself, you should gather up some points for your defense rather than trying to make an empty debate. Saying "I said he's sucking it because he is" isn't proving anything other than you think he's sucking it. However, I examined the fact that his cheeks lact the effect that suction has on them. These things I'm saying can easily be refferenced by you. However, telling me to "look at it" isn't going to do anything other than reafirm my point. Unless you can point out some graphical proof (such as I did), don't try to argue it. The same rules should apply to the defense of your being. I specifically pointed out cause and effect reasons as to how I came to this conclusion that you are either a) stupid, b) gay, or c) gay and stupid. Saying, "I think you have the tendencies because I said nothing about gay/anal sex. you did" is quite pathetic of a defense. Try to back it up with something. I say you're homosexual because you jumped to the conclusion that he was "sucking" the cake due to the peculiar way he was eating it. I find it hard to believe an honest, thinking person would jump to this conclusion. This being said, that you're homosexual, it is easy to make the claim that you enjoy anal sex from men. Try to analyze something further than "You insulted me about being gay, and you used facts. I shall rebuttle by saying you're the gay one because you called me gay." Face it, you need to grab a book and grow a brain. (In fact, as of typing this last edit, I am leaning more towards that you are worried about your e-coolness--which we all know that being gay would hurt--than how intelligent you come off as. However, this being said, we can also say that you're gay, because only gay people are stupid. If they weren't, then they would realize that they should be fucking women and that their penis should NOT be going into an anus--nonetheless an anus of another man. My conclusion. You're stupid. ***s are stupid. You're a ***. Do you see how that works?)

`Zodiac']I was giving a theory about your psyche. Of course someone with a single digit IQ, like yourself, couldn't realize that. This is shown by your lame rebuttle, "No... I think you're the one with the tendancies..." Good job at showing everyone you're a moron.

 

As far as sucking a cake, only someone infatuated with homosexuality would make that assumption. At examining closely, it appears he is simply holding his mouth open and holding a piece of cake up to it. His cheeks do not show that he is applying suction to anything. The only thing you can see is that he's keeping his mouth open so it appears he's eating the cake (or possibly actually eating it). Clearly not sucking the cake.

 

I can't wait until you grow up from your infatuation with all things gay.

 

hahahahahah. I understood what you were saying. You are the one who turned me saying "he is sucking the cake" into some homo-erotic escapade. Nothing I said had any sort of homosexual innuendo. You are the one who placed the innuendo upon it, thus making YOU the one with the tendancies to change everything into something homosexual. Is that explained clearly enough for you? Fucking idiot.

 

 

EDIT: Holy shit you sure do get worked up.. hahaha. As for me defending myself.

 

`Zodiac'] because you're are stupid.

 

Nice edit, btw... your still the one with homosexual tendencies.

 

I don't need to defend myself against your rediculously retarded rambles... My defense is as solid as your accusations. To me, he appears to be sucking the cake. I didn't say he was gay, or that he was sucking cock, you turned it into that. You are so long winded with these responses and edits.. you must be trying really hard to distract people from the fact that you are the one with the tendancies, not me.

hahahahahah. I understood what you were saying. You are the one who turned me saying "he is sucking the cake" into some homo-erotic escapade. Nothing I said had any sort of homosexual innuendo. You are the one who placed the innuendo upon it, thus making YOU the one with the tendancies to change everything into something homosexual. Is that explained clearly enough for you? Fucking idiot.

 

 

EDIT: Holy shit you sure do get worked up.. hahaha. As for me defending myself.

 

 

 

Nice edit, btw... your still the one with homosexual tendencies.

 

I don't need to defend myself against your rediculously retarded rambles... My defense is as solid as your accusations. To me, he appears to be sucking the cake. I didn't say he was gay, or that he was sucking cock, you turned it into that. You are so long winded with these responses and edits.. you must be trying really hard to distract people from the fact that you are the one with the tendancies, not me.

 

So if it had no meaning, why post it dumass.

So if it had no meaning, why post it dumass.

 

Because people usually eat cake, not suck on it. Isn't that pretty fucking obvious? Dumbass.

So if it had no meaning, why post it dumass.

 

This is exactally what was going through my head.

 

If "Wtf he is sucking the cake" had no meaning, no inuendo, or was not an attempt to flame him, then why post it?

Because people usually eat cake, not suck on it. Isn't that pretty fucking obvious? Dumbass.

 

THEN

 

`Zodiac']This is exactally what was going through my head.

 

If "Wtf he is sucking the cake" had no meaning, no inuendo, or was not an attempt to flame him, then why post it?

 

 

 

Read the thread before responding much? I am fucking done here, have fun with it.

wow all this for me, im special.

 

and to ur question MPbitch not inbred and not funny.

Because people usually eat cake, not suck on it. Isn't that pretty fucking obvious? Dumbass.

 

Ok, I am going to start posting every fucking thing that pops into my head. ready?

 

This burrito is good, I really like this song, I wonder why otehr people don't. Sometimes don't you just enjoy a good glass of water. Hmm I wonder when i can get that quarter ounce. Is seinfeild on? What time is it.

 

 

You are a fucking idiot, zodiac proved that you were being a homo-troll so just get over it.

 

wow all this for me, im special.

 

and to ur question MPbitch not inbred and not funny.

 

 

Ok, thank you, that is all I wanted to know. Don't worry, you start to look better once you get older.

You are so long winded with these responses and edits.. you must be trying really hard to distract people from the fact that you are the one with the tendancies, not me.

 

 

My posts come off as long winded because I actually can form a sentance without the constant use of ellipses. No, the fact that I can form a complex sentance with more gramatical complexities that you are capable of just shows that my brain is further developed than yours.

 

As far as sucking the cake, everyone can tell you implied a flame or else it wouldn't have been posted. "Most people eat cake as opposed to suck on it." Yes, this is exactally my point. Most people DO eat cake. So what makes you think he's not? It's the fact that you see the Cake as some form of phallic symbol (probably because it's related to myg0t and myg0t is synonymous with big epenes.) and that him sucking on such a phallic symbol denotes a homosexual fetish. I jump to this conclusion simply because there is no graphical proof to say he is not eating it in a pecular way. You just jumped to the conclusion he was sucking it. Thus, you are gay (reference my satement about the phallic symbol).

 

EDIT: I forgot what I was going to put here

THEN

 

 

 

 

 

Read the thread before responding much? I am fucking done here, have fun with it.

 

 

You're obvious lack of attention to detail shows your carelessness.

 

If you noticed, from when MPbitch posted to when I realized the page updated, hit quote, gathered my thoughts as to whether or not I wanted to repeat MPbitch verbatim or not, then actually type my post, then hit reply, only TWO minutes had elapsed. This leaves 5 things for me to do in 2 minutes. That's 120 seconds. That's 24 seconds per thing (if devided equally). My post had approx 33 words in it. Considering I type at about 95 words per minute at this time of the night, it would have taken me approx 20 seconds to type that excluding typos and grammar. This doesn't leave much time to do much.

I tried the whole sucking on the cake thing and it really doesn't work as well as just eating it would. It gets sucked down your throat and then you start choking.

 

Very bad idea.

I tried the whole sucking on the cake thing and it really doesn't work as well as just eating it would. It gets sucked down your throat and then you start choking.

 

Very bad idea.

 

 

I agree, I just dont think sucking cake is a physically possible as a way to ingest it.

After your done sucking the cake you have giant clumps of cake going down your esophagus, unchewed.

`Zodiac']My posts come off as long winded because I actually can form a sentance without the constant use of ellipses. No, the fact that I can form a complex sentance with more gramatical complexities that you are capable of just shows that my brain is further developed than yours.

 

As far as sucking the cake, everyone can tell you implied a flame or else it wouldn't have been posted. "Most people eat cake as opposed to suck on it." Yes, this is exactally my point. Most people DO eat cake. So what makes you think he's not? It's the fact that you see the Cake as some form of phallic symbol (probably because it's related to myg0t and myg0t is synonymous with big epenes.) and that him sucking on such a phallic symbol denotes a homosexual fetish. I jump to this conclusion simply because there is no graphical proof to say he is not eating it in a pecular way. You just jumped to the conclusion he was sucking it. Thus, you are gay (reference my satement about the phallic symbol).

 

EDIT: I forgot what I was going to put here

 

You type so much because you are too fucking stupid to get your point accross with a normal amount of words and you feel the need to articulate beyond reason to make yourself seem intelligent. A long response doesn't make you intelligent, or correct. You care way too much.. and you're still the one with homosexual tendancies.

You type so much because you are too fucking stupid to get your point accross with a normal amount of words and you feel the need to articulate beyond reason to make yourself seem intelligent. A long response doesn't make you intelligent, or correct. You care way too much.. and you're still the one with homosexual tendancies.

 

You showed him.

You type so much because you are too fucking stupid to get your point accross with a normal amount of words and you feel the need to articulate beyond reason to make yourself seem intelligent. A long response doesn't make you intelligent, or correct. You care way too much.. and you're still the one with homosexual tendancies.

 

 

I thought you said you were done? Apparently not.

 

Also, I can convey my point in little ammounts of words, but to do so probably means I'm not backing up my points with reasonable arguments (i.e. exactally what you're doing).

 

ONE of my long responses was filled with more convincing arguments than all of yours combined. Considering I backed my arguments, I automaticaly win. Also considering I'm gaining backing from other viewers of the thread, I seem to have won the majority vote, as well. No, a long response does not make you intelligent (but a long, well written one does hint at least a decent intelligence) nor correct. However, considering I backed up my opinions with statements that can easily be compared, I won.

 

As far as "me being the one with the homosexual tendancies," You have yet to prove how that is the case. Also, I love how you keep coming back to this defense.

 

 

 

 

You want less words, then I'll do it:

 

You're gay. You're stupid. I'm right, and you're wrong.

 

Better?

 

 

 

EDIT: I thought I should explain some things in my post a little bit better. Since you're dumb, I figured you might need the explanation. The fact is, my pots are long because I'm disputing almost EVERYTHING you're saying, while you're picking and choosing what you think you can defend (obviously because I CLEARLY win those points). Also, here's a hint. If you would like to seem less gay, stop bringing up the point I accused you of having tendancies. You're frantically trying to prove that's not the case and it is, itself, making you look gay.

 

I threw the possibility of you having homosexuality tendencies along side of the posibility that you're too stupid to come up with a non-homosexual related flame. Both can be assumed from a flame of homosexual nature. However, from the begning you've taken much offense from the hypothesis that you're gay and have only been primarily debating that one point. Instead of choosing the other case--being that you're stupid--you chose this one. This is clearly proof you're too selfconcious about your sexuality and not concered about your intelligence (possibly becase you know I'm right. Just like you don't debate most of what I say because you can see I'm right.)

`Zodiac']I thought you said you were done? Apparently not.

 

Also, I can convey my point in little ammounts of words, but to do so probably means I'm not backing up my points with reasonable arguments (i.e. exactally what you're doing).

 

ONE of my long responses was filled with more convincing arguments than all of yours combined. Considering I backed my arguments, I automaticaly win. Also considering I'm gaining backing from other viewers of the thread, I seem to have won the majority vote, as well. No, a long response does not make you intelligent (but a long, well written one does hint at least a decent intelligence) nor correct. However, considering I backed up my opinions with statements that can easily be compared, I won.

 

As far as "me being the one with the homosexual tendancies," You have yet to prove how that is the case. Also, I love how you keep coming back to this defense.

 

 

 

 

You want less words, then I'll do it:

 

You're gay. You're stupid. I'm right, and you're wrong.

 

Better?

 

 

 

EDIT: I thought I should explain some things in my post a little bit better. Since you're dumb, I figured you might need the explanation. The fact is, my pots are long because I'm disputing almost EVERYTHING you're saying, while you're picking and choosing what you think you can defend (obviously because I CLEARLY win those points). Also, here's a hint. If you would like to seem less gay, stop bringing up the point I accused you of having tendancies. You're frantically trying to prove that's not the case and it is, itself, making you look gay.

 

I threw the possibility of you having homosexuality tendencies along side of the posibility that you're too stupid to come up with a non-homosexual related flame. Both can be assumed from a flame of homosexual nature. However, from the begning you've taken much offense from the hypothesis that you're gay and have only been primarily debating that one point. Instead of choosing the other case--being that you're stupid--you chose this one. This is clearly proof you're too selfconcious about your sexuality and not concered about your intelligence (possibly becase you know I'm right. Just like you don't debate most of what I say because you can see I'm right.)

 

 

I don't debate what you say because you are wrong and there is no need for me to even attempt a defense. You care way, way too much about this. You obviously have all the time in the world to respond with these insane responses.. so have fun. You are so raged.

I don't debate what you say because you are wrong and there is no need for me to even attempt a defense. You care way, way too much about this. You obviously have all the time in the world to respond with these insane responses.. so have fun. You are so raged.

 

LOL LEIK U TOTALLY RAGED DAT GAI U ARE DA ROXXER NOW

I don't debate what you say because you are wrong and there is no need for me to even attempt a defense. You care way, way too much about this. You obviously have all the time in the world to respond with these insane responses.. so have fun. You are so raged.

 

 

Rifk. Thank you for proving your obviously insuperior intelligence. You've been defending what I've been saying about you being homosexual. So are you openly admiting you're agay?

 

I don't care at all about this.

 

I am not raged, and I find it funny you say that since I instigated it. I've been enjoying every minute of this and I'm the one that started it with my first post. I have no reason to be raged, and I'm not displaying any signs of being raged. All you can say is that I enjoy disproving all that you say. Also, I can see you're out of things to say because you're resorting to "you're so raged" when there's no signs of being raged. All trolls do this.

 

In fact, If I was raged do you think I would be able to calmly and correctly type out my sentances or continue to respond in a calm mannar? No. If I was raged I'd be resorting to personal attacks with no backing claims or would stop reposting.

 

 

 

LOL LEIK U TOTALLY RAGED DAT GAI U ARE DA ROXXER NOW

rifk

MP's his name, and trolling is his game

 

 

K?

`Zodiac']Rifk. Thank you for proving your obviously insuperior intelligence. You've been defending what I've been saying about you being homosexual. So are you openly admiting you're agay?

 

I don't care at all about this.

 

I am not raged, and I find it funny you say that since I instigated it. I've been enjoying every minute of this and I'm the one that started it with my first post. I have no reason to be raged, and I'm not displaying any signs of being raged. All you can say is that I enjoy disproving all that you say. Also, I can see you're out of things to say because you're resorting to "you're so raged" when there's no signs of being raged. All trolls do this.

 

In fact, If I was raged do you think I would be able to calmly and correctly type out my sentances or continue to respond in a calm mannar? No. If I was raged I'd be resorting to personal attacks with no backing claims or would stop reposting.

 

 

rifk

 

Alright, thanks for proving me right. Let me know when you're out of the closet so we can :gaysex:

now this guy really has homosexual tendencies.

http://edition.cnn.com/2001/SHOWBIZ/Music/02/12/eminem.elton/elton.john.jpg

now this guy really has homosexual tendencies.

http://edition.cnn.com/2001/SHOWBIZ/Music/02/12/eminem.elton/elton.john.jpg

 

 

Now you're just lying. This is the straightest man EVER.

 

 

 

 

 

Okay I lied, but he makes a good mother.

this thread sucks