Posted March 11, 200619 yr pic of quake 3 on 10240x3072 with 18 monitors. http://plastk.net/blog/index.php?title=quake_3&more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1
March 11, 200619 yr thats nuts how they split it into 18 monitors. must have had to have 9 or more video cards in those systesm that were hooked up.
March 11, 200619 yr Looks a bit fake, check out the bottom side monitors (especially the right ones) I'm not sure if that's just a weird shadow or a bad photoshop job.
March 11, 200619 yr having the split between each monitor would drive me nuts when looking far range. Would be easy to lose somthing between monitors
March 11, 200619 yr Imagine CS that big. :rape: same shit, different screenshot, who fucking cares? It's a waste of moniters.
March 12, 200619 yr Its called a projector, cheaper and better looking; heck I'd rather get a projector than that any day...
March 12, 200619 yr projector > this gay setup btw, note the "Quake 3 running at 10240x3072 resolution at 15-30 FPS"... ON FUCKING QUAKE3, WITH 12 LINUX SERVERS.. that's gay. MY computer could do better than that with so much monitors attached to it FFS
March 12, 200619 yr pic of quake 3 on 10240x3072 with 18 monitors. http://plastk.net/blog/index.php?title=quake_3&more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1 :ugh:
