March 23, 200619 yr um no? China has about 1.3 Billion people. the world has roughly 6 billion people, making it closer to 1/6..:drool2: mistype asswad lol......damnit hate it when i do that stupid shit....fucking #'s
March 23, 200619 yr I don't think nuking a 'random abandoned field' makes a difference. The radiation and fallout is what kills most people. As for N. Korea or Iran attacking us, they never will (atleast the continental US, I'm not arguing against regional troops). N. Korea will always poin the nukes at Japan or S. Kore, and Iran always at Israel or Iraq. Why piss on America directly when you can piss on America's friends a thousand times easier for nearly the same effect? It won't be the same effect though, if you attack America they will be injured and pissed if it is an ally, they will just be pissed with no handicap besides lack of the allie's forces.
March 23, 200619 yr Australia will be the first to go. Why in the fuck would that be? As long as Australia doesn't follow whatever the US is doing we should be fine, but since we are following that country around, I expect Indonesia and other nearby countries to attack us. North Korea....i doubt it
March 23, 200619 yr It won't be the same effect though, if you attack America they will be injured and pissed if it is an ally, they will just be pissed with no handicap besides lack of the allie's forces. History has shown time and time again that the USA's ability to go to war and win when we are not provoked is only slightly above average. Histry has also shown that the USA's record of going to war over an attack that we attribute to the country we're about to stomp out is 100% winning. We have never lost a war that was provoked. You simply can't outproduce the United States when we shift the entire country into war production. It cannot be done. We are giants and the only people that comes close in pure production capabilities is China and India, and they can't hope to sustain for half as long as we can. Bottom line is this: if your country attacks the USA then your country will be invaded, your government will be taken out, you will be reduced to shacks, and then the USA will build you up again in our image.
March 23, 200619 yr Gusy dont say europe as lets face it only we here at england would fight wars every other country in europe is pussies - france germany and spain are all ***gots who are too scared to go to iraq and fight terrorism so they just leave the dirty work to us, the uk, and america. in the hope that things like the madrid bombings wont happen again although they will, when the terrorists want to "make an islamic state" an choose spain as their next target - but anyways, thats enough of that If korea launched a nuke it would be destroyed before it even reached america i mean, dont they even have stuff in space now that could destroy a nuke?? and this shit annoys me - we can happily get along at the olympics and stuff lol then a yr later we all wana blow each other up anyway, nukes arent really a threat now, although korea and iran both need to have their asses kicked. p.s. some countires in europe are pretty cool like belgium and holland but they are too small to do anything. the big countries like spain france and germany are all ***gots and bum each other
March 23, 200619 yr North Korea threatened to attack the united states in a premtive strike with nukes. Are they serious???? How many nukes do they have? Do they not know that america will make their country a waste land?? America will send N Korea back to the stone age. AMERICA IS INVINCIBLE, SURRENDER!
March 23, 200619 yr Honestly, the only big non-pussy allied countries left are USA and England. Everyone else thinks that if we just try to reason with them they will just go away. Like France, except that they are almost fucking allies with Iran, they might as well make it official so we can just put thier crapy country out of its misery. (Dkay will be spared)
March 23, 200619 yr and the thing is China is one of the leading world markets now.......we better not be bitchs towards them :happysad:China is ranked 118th in the world in terms of gdp per capita - somewhere around 6,000. They don't have that great an economy. Russia is on the border of China.....there are many reasons why they would get involved.....China is 1/3 the population of the WHOLE planet.....they can move there army over the whole continent devouring all resources in there path and killing everything in there way = |China has alot of people, and a small army. The vast, vast majority of their population consists of uneducated rice farmers that live out in the country and couldn't fire a gun if their life depended on it.
March 23, 200619 yr v0dka']China is ranked 118th in the world in terms of gdp per capita - somewhere around 6,000. They don't have that great an economy. China has alot of people, and a small army. The vast, vast majority of their population consists of uneducated rice farmers that live out in the country and couldn't fire a gun if their life depended on it. And a lot of little childrens
March 23, 200619 yr NWA']History has shown time and time again that the USA's ability to go to war and win when we are not provoked is only slightly above average. Histry has also shown that the USA's record of going to war over an attack that we attribute to the country we're about to stomp out is 100% winning. We have never lost a war that was provoked. You simply can't outproduce the United States when we shift the entire country into war production. It cannot be done. We are giants and the only people that comes close in pure production capabilities is China and India, and they can't hope to sustain for half as long as we can. Bottom line is this: if your country attacks the USA then your country will be invaded, your government will be taken out, you will be reduced to shacks, and then the USA will build you up again in our image. Quoted for truth
March 23, 200619 yr NWA'] Bottom line is this: if your country attacks the USA then your country will be invaded, your government will be taken out, you will be reduced to shacks, and then the USA will build you up again in our image. Have you forgotten about Veitnam? They fucking slaughterd the americans! It doesnt fucking matter if you have more powerful weapons, Vietnam had barly nothing, usa had everything, and you lost! If you think that the people of any country will just give up while they let the usa just take thier land and kill thier people you dangerously underestimated them! If your country was invaded, almost the enitre pop will join to kill the enemy. As long as you have a means to fight, and not just because your taking orders you can win! If anyone invades china or some other country you better have the means to fight!
March 23, 200619 yr Have you forgotten about Veitnam? They fucking slaughterd the americans! Vietnam didnt attack america you moron, america attacked vietnam.
March 23, 200619 yr NWA'] Bottom line is this: if your country attacks the USA then your country will be invaded, your government will be taken out, you will be reduced to shacks, and then the USA will build you up again in our image. sounds a lot like AIDS, if you 'penetrate' someone with HIV it gets into your system and breaks down all of your body's defenses until you're just a diseased mass flesh, meanwhile the virus just continues infecting your body until you die. and as far as Vietnam goes, that was in the sixties and the army's technology is slightly more advanced than it was back then. on top of that, no one approved of the war, the soldiers were drafted and not voluntary. The United States really didn't have a very good reason to go in there, we hadn't been attacked and the side being supported was lead by an inefficient, incapable, corrupt ass hole.
March 24, 200619 yr NWA']Thousands of Chinese troops stationed in Mexico? You think Texans will let a bunch of slant eyes across their border? That's not even worth calling a threat. Dude, put your pride aside and listen to logic...China has like 5 or something soldiers for everyone in the United States. That includes civilians, soldiers, government officials, etc. I'm not clear on the exact number but the fact is, they have a lot more soldiers than there are people in the United States. It'll be a pretty tough battle and the winner is unclear. As for nuclear capabilities, there are some speculations that China could be lying. Hell, they've been lying about their GDP report for sometime now. They might have more nukes than we think.
March 24, 200619 yr Dude, put your pride aside and listen to logic...China has like 5 or something soldiers for everyone in the United States. That includes civilians, soldiers, government officials, etc. I'm not clear on the exact number but the fact is, they have a lot more soldiers than there are people in the United States. It'll be a pretty tough battle and the winner is unclear. As for nuclear capabilities, there are some speculations that China could be lying. Hell, they've been lying about their GDP report for sometime now. They might have more nukes than we think. How are you going to get 5 Chinese for every Texan into Mexico? Fucking idiot. If China tried to go to war with America they would find that a large body of water called the Pacific Ocean lies between there and here. What are they going to do, teleport to the USA? Some dumbshit posted that China has people stationed in Mexico earlier, and my reply of "Texas could deal with that many chinks" was in regards to that point. Learn to read.
March 24, 200619 yr Have you forgotten about Veitnam? They fucking slaughterd the americans! It doesnt fucking matter if you have more powerful weapons, Vietnam had barly nothing, usa had everything, and you lost! If you think that the people of any country will just give up while they let the usa just take thier land and kill thier people you dangerously underestimated them! If your country was invaded, almost the enitre pop will join to kill the enemy. As long as you have a means to fight, and not just because your taking orders you can win! If anyone invades china or some other country you better have the means to fight! Japan in WW2 had an even better defensive position than Vietnam during the Vietnam War. United States marines marched from island to island killing every Nip in their path until their commanders stopped them. There was not a single island that we attempted to capture that we failed to take. Know the difference? Japan bombed the USA. Vietnam didn't. America was founded on the statement "Don't tread on me" and we will knock anyone into the fucking stone age if you fuck with us. Don't ever doubt that.
March 24, 200619 yr Dude, put your pride aside and listen to logic...China has like 5 or something soldiers for everyone in the United States. That includes civilians, soldiers, government officials, etc. I'm not clear on the exact number but the fact is, they have a lot more soldiers than there are people in the United States. It'll be a pretty tough battle and the winner is unclear. As for nuclear capabilities, there are some speculations that China could be lying. Hell, they've been lying about their GDP report for sometime now. They might have more nukes than we think. An army in a war with China would mean NOTHING. Absolutely nothing. The fact is, if we went to war with China, the world is over, simple as that. 1 nuke launched, and that would most likely be enough. War with China is extremely unlikely because of the fact that we support the vast majority of their economy. If China were to ween itself off US goods, things may be different. Vietnam compared to Pacific War Well also remember, we really didn't have to distinguish between friend and foe in places like Iwo Jima. The few civilians there didn't really try to disguise themselves as friends, and as a whole there were very few double agent types of situations. The war in Vietnam was technically a great success for the US, as the number of casualities for enemies were on the order of 20-40:1. In reality, you are correct though, as when the US is not directly attacked, people have a hard time sustaining justification for a war.
March 24, 200619 yr The american government are pussies who can't stand to have a nuke kill off part of their citizens if it means their approval rating will drop. North Korea has nukes, and can now threaten stuff. Everybody wins! Yes North Korea and Iran are now offical ragers.
March 24, 200619 yr Have you forgotten about Veitnam? They fucking slaughterd the americans! It doesnt fucking matter if you have more powerful weapons, Vietnam had barly nothing, usa had everything, and you lost! If you think that the people of any country will just give up while they let the usa just take thier land and kill thier people you dangerously underestimated them! If your country was invaded, almost the enitre pop will join to kill the enemy. As long as you have a means to fight, and not just because your taking orders you can win! If anyone invades china or some other country you better have the means to fight! We didn't get slaughtered. If we had stayed there we would have eventually won but at too great a cost, American Lives and Innocent Vietmanese lives, because the Vietcongs were hiding behind innocent women and children, if we had no morals we could have just napalmed the shit out of everywhere they might have been. Oh and we weren't trying to take over Vietnam, we were trying to get rid of the commy opressors who picked on the rest of vietnam.
March 24, 200619 yr Have you forgotten about Veitnam? They fucking slaughterd the americans! It doesnt fucking matter if you have more powerful weapons, Vietnam had barly nothing, usa had everything, and you lost! If you think that the people of any country will just give up while they let the usa just take thier land and kill thier people you dangerously underestimated them! If your country was invaded, almost the enitre pop will join to kill the enemy. As long as you have a means to fight, and not just because your taking orders you can win! If anyone invades china or some other country you better have the means to fight! War of politics, not of true military. If we had been able to deploy what we wanted to, that war would've been over without too many casualties. Lyndon Johnson was a moron for interfering with his military's strategies.
March 24, 200619 yr I said they didn't have an airforce compairable to ours. Thier mig's from the 80's are not going to beat out our brand newf-22's or wtv the fuck we have. And as they have the means to crank out a bunch of crafts, they don't have any money, so they don't put out 110,000 a year but they could if the put all their effort into it and they magicaly got enough money and materials. Edit: I skipped over the second part of your post, and yeh, Russia would fire thier nukes, and then nothing, they would be fucked. 2nd Edit: Also, lol @ anyone who is worried at all about N Korea's "Nuke Threat" or Iran's future of nuclear missle technology. The most powerful one they could make couldn't even reach US soil, and if by some crazy way they got a missle that could reach our soil, I doubt they could be very accurate and they would end up nuking some random abandoned field. As for Iran, they could hardly get their nuke past thier border if they had one. You make everything sound so easy. North Korea does have and a decent Air-force, as well as outnumbering us like 5-1. Oh yeah and that thing about their nukes not being able to reach US soil? I hate to burst your bubble but, they do have nuke that could reach US soil. You have to realize just all the things that would have to happen for anyone to launch a nuke at another country. You have to look at the consequences of firing a nuke. North Korea wouldn't fire a nuke at the US unless it felt forced to do so and was prepared to fight the whole world. Same with the US. These thing arn't as simple as just pressing a button.
March 24, 200619 yr it doesnt matter if it could reach the us or not, if anyone fires a nuke at anyone the entire worlds economy is going to suffer and here in the usa where killing some sand ******s causes gas prices to rise 3.50/gallon how the fuck do you think a nuke hitting ANYWHERE would affect us?
March 24, 200619 yr the number of casualities for enemies were on the order of 20-40:1. It was about 18 Vietnamese (Not sure if this is including civilians) people who died to every US soldier who died. Roughly 50000 US deaths to around 900000 Vietnamese deaths.