Jump to content

Featured Replies

  • Replies 182
  • Views 5.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i have heard such bullshit as this within 5 years.

 

and the last thing i heard was some man got shot in the head 100 times and lived.

 

:wow: your a f ag.

  • Author

Beta testing phase has been completed.

Official release date is set to April 25.

The official site will go fully only on April 20.

"Once i get this program, I'm sending it straight to Steam, just to be gay"

 

HAHA that made me chuckle.

  • Author

I'm no amateur coder, Valve will a tough time figuring out of detecting it ;)

Subscribers will also get an immediate update once a steam update will occur.

I'm no amateur coder, Valve will a tough time figuring out of detecting it ;)

Subscribers will also get an immediate update once a steam update will occur.

Your exactly right. They'll never be able to detect something that doesn't exist.

Your exactly right. They'll never be able to detect something that doesn't exist.

qft

 

lil bit funny too

thanks to all those that reported those bugs, please client#14 send in the reports again, i managed to delete them :/

rofl

I never said those "14" were from this site :), only the minority trusted faces were contacted from here

 

So you get minorities to beta test?

 

You think a jew is going to leek it?

 

Btw Never Vacstop without a spoone--The matricks

 

IS that right?

I havent watched that in forever.

packet spoofing is not that difficult to believe..but i was under the impression that all steam tcp traffic (minus game udp packets) were encrypted. im not saying this exists, but the idea of how it works seems plausible.

 

was the first post on 4-1 ?

  • Author
packet spoofing is not that difficult to believe..but i was under the impression that all steam tcp traffic (minus game udp packets) were encrypted.

 

It wasn't too hard to spoof the packets, but I had some minor problems when it wouldn't accept the packets and would occasionally disconnect, but I still managed to slightly reduce the chance of this happening, but this still stays the major bug in the first release.

It wasn't too hard to spoof the packets, but I had some minor problems when it wouldn't accept the packets and would occasionally disconnect, but I still managed to slightly reduce the chance of this happening, but this still stays the major bug in the first release.

geotop, do you even know what a packet is?

  • Author
geotop, do you even know what a packet is?

 

packets are data files that are send to a specific ip in which they are given(like an email send, image or anything else), in this case it's the VAC report which will never get send to Valve, instead a clean packet will be send all time therefore preventing any detection from Valve side, meaning no VAC2 Ban.

I've been reading this thread and I personally call bullshit. In my opinion, this guy would need access to actual Steam/VAC2 source code to get this working. Unless he's taken the time to reverse engineer the Visual Basic code, which is highly doubtful as it is a fairly inflexible and annoying language.

 

Also, there is no way an employee of Valve with this level of access would be leaking the code, as it is obviously proprietary and protected by the law. And finally, in addition, the image posted earlier is just a screenshot of the Steam UI photoshopped.

  • Author
By my luck, I reside in a country where I'm untouched by American law, I won't face any copyright issues, don't worry about that.
By my luck, I reside in a country where I'm untouched by American law, I won't face any copyright issues, don't worry about that.

 

That wasn't my point. The issue is you having access to the source code. It's very doubtful you have that kind of access, that is what I was trying to explain earlier. You'd have to be connected with an idiot who wants to lose his well-paid job with Valve or be that idiot.

 

Edit: Copyright issues? What the fuck. Where did I say anything about copyright issues?

  • Author
That wasn't my point. The issue is you having access to the source code. It's very doubtful you have that kind of access, that is what I was trying to explain earlier. You'd have to be connected with an idiot who wants to lose his well-paid job with Valve or be that idiot.

 

 

I wouldn't want to discuss about the source code subject in public for known reasons, and I think you understand why.

I wouldn't want to discuss about the source code subject in public for known reasons, and I think you understand why.

 

Heh. This is just weak flame bait now. Nice try.

  • Author
Heh. This is just weak flame bait now. Nice try.

 

 

Sorry if you got me wrong, but I just pointed out that I wouldn't want to discuss this in public, cause the subject is something that is better being private.

amazing what some people will do for attention... :gaysex2:

 

I would say nice photoshop job, but it wasn't.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.