My topic is nothing new. However, since no one else has found it fit to address directly, I will address it here. Let's start with my claim that it would be charitable of me not to mention that it is saddening to have to tell myg0t that it is the most hypersensitive, namby-pamby liar and cheat witnessed by the history of mankind. Fortunately, I am not beset by a spirit of false charity, so I will instead maintain that it has never gotten ahead because of its hard work or innovative ideas. Rather, all of its successes are due to kickbacks, bribes, black market double-dealing, outright thuggery, and unsavory political intrigue. Moreover, myg0t truly believes that "the norm" shouldn't have to worry about how the exceptions feel. It is just such chthonic megalomania, drugged-out egoism, and intellectual aberrancy that stirs myg0t to agitate for indoctrination programs in local schools. While myg0t insists that embracing a system of antinomianism will make everything right with the world, reality dictates otherwise. Actually, if you want a real dose of reality, look at how in a tacit concession of defeat, myg0t is now openly calling for the abridgment of various freedoms to accomplish coercively what its irascible, prissy words have failed at. I apologize if the following points are hard to follow but they're quite relevant to the gist of my argument. First, myg0t's prophecies are all too often clad in the sinful garb of interventionism. And second, I refuse to kowtow to myg0t's sententious cult. All of this means, of course, that myg0t doesn't use words for communication or for exchanging information. It uses them to disarm, to hypnotize, to mislead, and to deceive.

 

We mustn't let myg0t show a clear lack of respect not just for those brave souls who fought and died for what they believed in, but also for you, the readers of this letter. That would be like letting the Mafia serve as a new national police force in Italy. Ask myg0t about any of its cult followers who depressurize the frail vessel of human hopes, and the pretentious con artist will say, "I never meant they should go that far." Yeah, right. The truth is that myg0t keeps saying that vengeful, spleeny misanthropes are more deserving of honor than our nation's war heroes. Isn't that claim getting a little shopworn? I mean, it knows that performing an occasional act of charity will make some people forgive -- or at least overlook -- all of its batty excesses. My take on the matter is that the pauperism "debate" is not a debate. It is a harangue, a politically motivated, brilliantly publicized, fatuitous attack on progressive ideas. Myg0t is terrified that there might be an absolute reality outside itself, a reality that is what it is, regardless of its wishes, theories, hopes, daydreams, or decrees.

 

At first blush, it appears that myg0t runs at the first sign of trouble. However, I have to wonder where myg0t got the idea that it is my view that our elected officials should be available for purchase by special-interest groups. This sits hard with me because it is simply not true and I've never written anything to imply that it is. You might think that anyone who doesn't know that myg0t is obdurate must be inhabiting a different world. Well, if that's the case, then I'm afraid myg0t's legates must have spent the past month on Mars. The public is like a giant that myg0t has blindfolded, drugged, and gagged. This giant has plugs in his ears and myg0t leads him around by the nose. Clearly, such a giant needs to hammer out solutions on the anvil of discourse. That's why I feel obligated to notify the giant (i.e., the public) that myg0t is typical of dishonest apostates in its wild invocations to the irrational, the magic, and the fantastic to dramatize its practices.

 

Don't give myg0t's double standards a credibility they don't deserve. What is myg0t's current objective? As usual, there are multiple objectives:

 

* to institutionalize Lysenkoism through systematic violence, distorted religion, and dubious science,

* to interfere with my efforts to enhance people's curiosity, critical acumen, and aesthetic sensitivity, and

* to advocate measures that others criticize for being excessively feeble-minded.

 

Yes, Virginia, myg0t says that it needs a little more time to clean up its act. As far as I'm concerned, myg0t's time has run out. Having already explained that myg0t's mandarin prose has always appealed to wanton anthropophagi, let me now state that myg0t wants to numb the public to the mysticism and injustice in mainstream politics. Why it wants that, I don't know, but that's what it wants.

 

Although myg0t would like us to believe that its debauches are the result of a high-minded urge to do sociological research, it has given us neither good reason nor credible evidence to believe that. Its artifices, on the other hand, give us good reason to believe that it is a small part of a large movement that seeks to deny the obvious. But that's not all: By refusing to act, by refusing to foster mutual understanding, we are giving it the power to kill the messenger and control the message. Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe myg0t's subliminal psywar campaigns won't be used for political retribution. Admittedly, that's about as likely as Elvis materializing in my room tonight and singing Heartbreak Hotel. Still, the possibility does help one realize that no one has a higher opinion of myg0t than I, and I think myg0t's an impractical low-life.

 

When asked to mend its ways, myg0t will give people a wink and a smile, but when the wheels begin to turn, it's business as usual. It's possible that myg0t doesn't realize this because it has been ingrained with so much of pharisaism's propaganda. If that's the case, I recommend that we expose some of its twisted deeds. We have a right, an indisputable, inalienable, indefeasible, divine right to honor our nation's glorious mosaic of cultures and ethnicities, right? Right.

 

Myg0t seeks scapegoats for its own shortcomings by blaming the easiest target it can find, that is, the most pathetic miscreants you'll ever see. Whatever myg0t claims to the contrary, every so often, you'll see it lament, flog itself, cry mea culpa for seeking to tap into the national resurgence of overt demagogism, and vow never again to be so neurotic. Sadly, it always reverts to its old behavior immediately afterwards, making me think that what it considers a fair shake, the rest of us consider a repressive, humiliating, culture-stripping experience, so to speak. Consider the following, which I'll address in greater detail later: The reasons that myg0t gives for its inveracities clearly do not correspond with its real motives. Nevertheless, I can state with absolute certainty that myg0t's like the man behind the curtain in the Wizard of Oz. Pull back the curtain of Bonapartism and you'll see a dirty spouter hiding behind it, furiously pulling the levers of favoritism in a frowzy attempt to issue a flood of bogus legal documents. That sort of discovery should make any sane person realize that if we are powerless to upbraid myg0t for being so vicious, it is because we have allowed myg0t to make a big deal out of nothing. I am being absolutely serious when I say that myg0t has nothing but contempt for you, and you don't even know it. That's why I feel obligated to inform you that it has announced its intentions to waste natural resources. While doing so may earn myg0t a gold star from the mush-for-brains mercantalism crowd, it hates people who have huge supplies of the things it lacks. What myg0t lacks the most is common sense, which underlies my point that I've known some pickpockets who were impressively stroppy. However, myg0t is self-righteous, and that trumps stroppy every time. Believe it or not, I really want to believe that myg0t is a decent, honest organization. Unfortunately, as is often the case, what I want to believe proves to be fantasy. The truth is that I was personally offended -- and I don't easily offend -- by the value myg0t places on making me become increasingly frustrated, humiliated and angry. Now, I could go off on that point alone, but if, five years ago, I had described an organization like myg0t to you and told you that in five years, it'd impair the practice of democracy, you'd have thought me contemptuous. You'd have laughed at me and told me it couldn't happen. So it is useful now to note that, first, it has happened and, second, to try to understand how it happened and how it is an inspiration to snotty slimeballs everywhere. They panegyrize myg0t's crusade to convert our children to cultural zombies in a mass of unthinking and easily herded proletarian cattle and, more importantly, they don't realize that myg0t's shock troops have demonstrated brutally, horribly, and with great terror how they will undermine the intellectual purpose of higher education. For proof of this fact, I must point out that it seems clear that everything myg0t writes is littered with spelling errors, grammatical mistakes, missing punctuation, irregular capitalization, false statements, and incoherent thoughts and sentences. But we ought to look at the matter in a broader framework before we draw final conclusions on the subject: We see that I receive a great deal of correspondence from people all over the world. And one of the things that impresses me about it is the massive number of people who realize that I welcome myg0t's comments. However, myg0t needs to realize that it is always prating about how the purpose of life is self-gratification. (It used to say that everything is happy and fine and good, but the evidence is too contrary, so it's given up on that score.)

When you least expect it, myg0t might be diagnosed with a special type of mental illness that is not yet recognized. But for now, be aware that I no longer believe that trends like family breakdown, promiscuity, and violence are random events. Not only are they explicitly glorified and promoted by myg0t's contentious lamentations, but if you were to tell it that people should just treat each other with decency and respect, it'd just pull its security blanket a little tighter around itself and refuse to come out and deal with the real world. Myg0t demands obeisance from its supporters. Then, once they prove their loyalty, myg0t forces them to help snivelling fugitives evade capture by the authorities.

 

If you think that we should abandon the institutionalized and revered concept of democracy, then think again. Myg0t used to complain about being persecuted. Now it is our primary persecutor. This reversal of roles reminds me that if the human race is to survive on this planet, we will have to turn random, senseless violence into meaningful action. I'm not a pudibund person. I'd like nothing more than to extend my hand in friendship to myg0t's thralls and convey my hope that in the days to come we can work together to defy the international enslavement of entire peoples. Unfortunately, knowing them, they'd rather replace intellectual integrity with blathering sloganeering because that's what myg0t wants.

 

myg0t's perfidious scribblings are in full flower, and their poisonous petals of stoicism are blooming all around us. Let's conduct a Gedankenexperiment. Suppose we could create a hypothetical population free of lackluster, materialistic leeches. Let's assume, furthermore, that myg0t were powerless to blow the whole situation way out of proportion. In this hypothetical situation, wouldn't we all be free to instill a sense of responsibility and maturity in those who accelerate our descent into the cesspool of Fabianism? Let's make this dream a reality. Let's get people to realize that there is a proper place in life for hatred. Hatred of that which is wrong is a powerful and valuable tool. But when myg0t perverts hatred in order to exploit the feelings of charity and guilt that many people have over the plight of the homeless, it becomes clear that it wants to leach integrity and honor from our souls. What's wrong with that? What's wrong is myg0t's gossamer grasp of reality. I could be wrong about any or all of this, but at the moment, the above fits what I know of history, people, and current conditions. If anyone sees anything wrong or has some new facts or theories on this, I'd love to hear about them.

Couldn't have said it better myself :tear:

Random argument generator?

I am going to make this short but sweet: Mr. TheSick Empire, Jr. is an inspiration to effete, uninformed losers everywhere. They panegyrize his crusade to renege on an incredibly large number of promises and, more importantly, they don't realize that I don't need to tell you that in a country like ours where separatism, Marxism, and resistentialism run rampant, we need laws to help enforce behavior that ought to be performed out of common sense, decency, and tolerance. That should be self-evident. What is less evident is that TheSick has no discernible talents. The only things he has indisputably mastered are biological functions. Well, I suppose TheSick's also good at convincing people that we should all bear the brunt of his actions, but my point is that what TheSick is doing is not an innocent, recreational sort of thing. It is a criminal activity, it is an immoral activity, it is a socially destructive activity, and it is a profoundly high-handed activity. The following paragraphs are intended as an initial, open-ended sketch of how bad the current situation is. To tolerate TheSick's careless, presumptuous outbursts simply because they're not packaged and sold as scornful is to ruin people's lives. Don't let yourself be persuaded by nutty autocrats who secretly want to obliterate our sense of identity. Honest people will admit that telling the truth is too much trouble for fatuous ragamuffins bent on getting their way. Concerned people are not afraid to introduce an important, but underrepresented, angle on TheSick's detestable catch-phrases. And sensible people know that TheSick wants us to think of him as a do-gooder. Keep in mind, though, that he wants to "do good" with other people's money and often with other people's lives. If TheSick really wanted to be a do-gooder, he could start by admitting that he is extremely overweening. In fact, let's see what my handy-dandy Overweening-O-Meter has to say about TheSick. Whoa! The needle is off the scale! It's a good thing I checked, because his cheerleaders believe that people are pawns to be used and manipulated. I say to them, "Prove it" -- not that they'll be able to, of course, but because when TheSick says that coercion in the name of liberty is a valid use of state power, that's just a load of spucatum tauri. If you delve deeply into TheSick's demands and thus, in tranquil clarity, submit to contemplation the equivocations of passive-aggressive theologasters, you will really discover why TheSick is willing -- even eager -- to jettison his scruples in order to stay ahead of the pack. That's the current situation, and if you have any doubt about the reality of it, then you haven't been paying close enough attention to what's been happening in the world. I have taken the liberty of letting him know that he is out to deny us the opportunity to free people from the spell of materialism that he has cast over them. And when we play his game, we become accomplices.

 

TheSick says that lackluster swaggerers are more deserving of honor than our nation's war heroes. Wow! Isn't that like hiding the stolen goods in the closet and, when the cops come in, standing in front of the closet door and exclaiming, "They're not in here!"? It would be a crying shame to let inconsiderate nihilism enthusiasts interfere with a person's work performance, bodily security, physical movement, and privacy rights. We can therefore extrapolate that he is completely versipellous. When TheSick's among plebeians, he warms the cockles of their hearts by remonstrating against sensationalism. But when he's safely surrounded by his expositors, TheSick instructs them to till the prudish side of the irrationalism garden. That type of cunning two-sidedness tells us that it's a pity that two thousand years after Christ, the voices of oleaginous individuals like TheSick can still be heard, worse still that they're listened to, and worst of all that anyone believes them. Just because TheSick and his apologists don't like being labelled as "self-deceiving drunks" or "abysmal odious-types" doesn't mean the shoe doesn't fit.

 

If we let TheSick prime the pump of Stalinism, civilization itself will fall, but, as you know, if he were to use more accessible language, then a larger number of people would be able to understand what he's saying. The downside for TheSick, of course, is that a larger number of people would also understand that he would have us believe that clever one-liners are a valid substitute for actual thinking. That, of course, is nonsense, total nonsense. But TheSick is surrounded by impertinent jabberers who parrot the same nonsense, which is why the truth of this is by no means limited to the field of general culture, but applies to politics as well, -- and TheSick knows it. It has been said that TheSick has managed to elude any direct ties to specific acts of negligence -- no small feat considering his history. That makes sense to me. I believe it's true. But it obviously implies that TheSick wants all of us to believe that granting him complete control over our lives is as important as breathing air. That's why he sponsors brainwashing in the schools, brainwashing by the government, brainwashing statements made to us by politicians, entertainers, and sports stars, and brainwashing by the big advertisers and the news media. And there you have it. Mr. TheSick Empire, Jr. is guided by the brutish ethos of collectivism.

humpy']I am going to make this short but sweet: Mr. TheSick Empire, Jr. is an inspiration to effete, uninformed losers everywhere. They panegyrize his crusade to renege on an incredibly large number of promises and, more importantly, they don't realize that I don't need to tell you that in a country like ours where separatism, Marxism, and resistentialism run rampant, we need laws to help enforce behavior that ought to be performed out of common sense, decency, and tolerance. That should be self-evident. What is less evident is that TheSick has no discernible talents. The only things he has indisputably mastered are biological functions. Well, I suppose TheSick's also good at convincing people that we should all bear the brunt of his actions, but my point is that what TheSick is doing is not an innocent, recreational sort of thing. It is a criminal activity, it is an immoral activity, it is a socially destructive activity, and it is a profoundly high-handed activity. The following paragraphs are intended as an initial, open-ended sketch of how bad the current situation is. To tolerate TheSick's careless, presumptuous outbursts simply because they're not packaged and sold as scornful is to ruin people's lives. Don't let yourself be persuaded by nutty autocrats who secretly want to obliterate our sense of identity. Honest people will admit that telling the truth is too much trouble for fatuous ragamuffins bent on getting their way. Concerned people are not afraid to introduce an important, but underrepresented, angle on TheSick's detestable catch-phrases. And sensible people know that TheSick wants us to think of him as a do-gooder. Keep in mind, though, that he wants to "do good" with other people's money and often with other people's lives. If TheSick really wanted to be a do-gooder, he could start by admitting that he is extremely overweening. In fact, let's see what my handy-dandy Overweening-O-Meter has to say about TheSick. Whoa! The needle is off the scale! It's a good thing I checked, because his cheerleaders believe that people are pawns to be used and manipulated. I say to them, "Prove it" -- not that they'll be able to, of course, but because when TheSick says that coercion in the name of liberty is a valid use of state power, that's just a load of spucatum tauri. If you delve deeply into TheSick's demands and thus, in tranquil clarity, submit to contemplation the equivocations of passive-aggressive theologasters, you will really discover why TheSick is willing -- even eager -- to jettison his scruples in order to stay ahead of the pack. That's the current situation, and if you have any doubt about the reality of it, then you haven't been paying close enough attention to what's been happening in the world. I have taken the liberty of letting him know that he is out to deny us the opportunity to free people from the spell of materialism that he has cast over them. And when we play his game, we become accomplices.

 

TheSick says that lackluster swaggerers are more deserving of honor than our nation's war heroes. Wow! Isn't that like hiding the stolen goods in the closet and, when the cops come in, standing in front of the closet door and exclaiming, "They're not in here!"? It would be a crying shame to let inconsiderate nihilism enthusiasts interfere with a person's work performance, bodily security, physical movement, and privacy rights. We can therefore extrapolate that he is completely versipellous. When TheSick's among plebeians, he warms the cockles of their hearts by remonstrating against sensationalism. But when he's safely surrounded by his expositors, TheSick instructs them to till the prudish side of the irrationalism garden. That type of cunning two-sidedness tells us that it's a pity that two thousand years after Christ, the voices of oleaginous individuals like TheSick can still be heard, worse still that they're listened to, and worst of all that anyone believes them. Just because TheSick and his apologists don't like being labelled as "self-deceiving drunks" or "abysmal odious-types" doesn't mean the shoe doesn't fit.

 

If we let TheSick prime the pump of Stalinism, civilization itself will fall, but, as you know, if he were to use more accessible language, then a larger number of people would be able to understand what he's saying. The downside for TheSick, of course, is that a larger number of people would also understand that he would have us believe that clever one-liners are a valid substitute for actual thinking. That, of course, is nonsense, total nonsense. But TheSick is surrounded by impertinent jabberers who parrot the same nonsense, which is why the truth of this is by no means limited to the field of general culture, but applies to politics as well, -- and TheSick knows it. It has been said that TheSick has managed to elude any direct ties to specific acts of negligence -- no small feat considering his history. That makes sense to me. I believe it's true. But it obviously implies that TheSick wants all of us to believe that granting him complete control over our lives is as important as breathing air. That's why he sponsors brainwashing in the schools, brainwashing by the government, brainwashing statements made to us by politicians, entertainers, and sports stars, and brainwashing by the big advertisers and the news media. And there you have it. Mr. TheSick Empire, Jr. is guided by the brutish ethos of collectivism.

 

If I were to summarize Humpy's incoherent codices I'd need only one word: feral. Some background is in order: We have a dilemma of leviathan proportions on our hands: Should we make an impartial and well-informed evaluation of the advantages and disadvantages of Humpy's endeavors, or is it sufficient to think outside the box? I can give you only my best estimate, made after long and anxious consideration, but I do not pose as an expert in these matters. I can say only that Humpy's manifestos do not represent progress. They represent insanity masquerading as progress. Ageism is dangerous. Humpy's conniving version of it is doubly so.

 

Humpy knows how to lie. It's too bad he doesn't yet understand the ramifications of lying. His cringers are often caught trying to precipitate riots. Of course, they deny this, but we all know full well that I maintain that the best way to overcome misunderstanding, prejudice, and hate is by means of reason, common sense, clear thinking, and goodwill. Humpy, in contrast, believes that cultural tradition has never contributed a single thing to the advancement of knowledge or understanding. The conclusion to draw from this conflict of views should be obvious: Humpy's attempts to impose a narrow theological agenda on secular society are much worse than mere tribalism. They are hurtful, malicious, criminal behavior and deserve nothing less than our collective condemnation. Okay, I've written enough for one letter, so let me just finish by saying that Humpy's indiscretions will have consequences, intended and otherwise.

Baleful. Obdurate. Slaphappy. In case you can't tell, I'm making a direct reference to TheSickEmpire. Unless you share my view that the brutal nature of TheSickEmpire's antics distracts us from the real lessons we could learn from a rigorous critique of his asseverations, there's no need for you to hear me further. At first, you might be unsure as to whether I am not particularly fond of him. But on deeper inspection, you'll clearly conclude that his morals are not pedantic treatises expressing theories or extravaganzas dealing in fables or fancies. They are substantial, sober outpourings from the very soul of cynicism. Lastly, I can't end this letter without mentioning that it is impracticable to push a consistent vision that responds to most people's growing fears about what I call truculent hoodlums without exploiting the inner unity of our national will.

humpy']Baleful. Obdurate. Slaphappy. In case you can't tell' date=' I'm making a direct reference to TheSickEmpire. Unless you share my view that the brutal nature of TheSickEmpire's antics distracts us from the real lessons we could learn from a rigorous critique of his asseverations, there's no need for you to hear me further. At first, you might be unsure as to whether I am not particularly fond of him. But on deeper inspection, you'll clearly conclude that his morals are not pedantic treatises expressing theories or extravaganzas dealing in fables or fancies. They are substantial, sober outpourings from the very soul of cynicism. Lastly, I can't end this letter without mentioning that it is impracticable to push a consistent vision that responds to most people's growing fears about what I call truculent hoodlums without exploiting the inner unity of our national will.[/quote']

 

I wish I didn't have to write a letter like this one, but recent events leave me no choice. In the text that follows, when I quote from Humpy, I will use the word "excrement" in place of another word which is now apparently permitted in general circulation publications and which I have edited out. What we have been imparting to him -- or what he has been eliciting from us -- is a half-submerged, barely intended logic, contaminated by wishes and tendencies we prefer not to acknowledge.

 

Can you really blame me for suggesting that Humpy's band is a wretched hive of scum and villainy? In spite of all Humpy has done, I must admit I really like the guy. No, just kidding. Hey, it's not my fault that if he honestly believes that some of my points are not valid, I would love to get some specific feedback from him.

I wish I didn't have to write a letter like this one, but recent events leave me no choice. In the text that follows, when I quote from Humpy, I will use the word "excrement" in place of another word which is now apparently permitted in general circulation publications and which I have edited out. What we have been imparting to him -- or what he has been eliciting from us -- is a half-submerged, barely intended logic, contaminated by wishes and tendencies we prefer not to acknowledge.

 

Can you really blame me for suggesting that Humpy's band is a wretched hive of scum and villainy? In spite of all Humpy has done, I must admit I really like the guy. No, just kidding. Hey, it's not my fault that if he honestly believes that some of my points are not valid, I would love to get some specific feedback from him.

 

I have two orders of business regarding TheSickEmpire. To plunge right into it, TheSickEmpire keeps telling us that there's no difference between normal people like you and me and froward shysters. Are we also supposed to believe that public opinion is a reliable indicator of what's true and what isn't? I didn't think so. It's my understanding that his operatives, when they are taken seriously at all, are considered by most scholars to be of questionable credibility. While this lighthearted statement adds sorely needed humor to an otherwise tense situation, when I say that he clings to libertinism like a drowning man clings to a life preserver, this does not, I repeat, does not mean that you and I are inferior to self-satisfied autocrats. This is a common fallacy held by obstreperous, dirty nincompoops. In conclusion, let me just say that this is where the rubber hits the road.

humpy']I have two orders of business regarding TheSickEmpire. To plunge right into it' date=' TheSickEmpire keeps telling us that there's no difference between normal people like you and me and froward shysters. Are we also supposed to believe that public opinion is a reliable indicator of what's true and what isn't? I didn't think so. It's my understanding that his operatives, when they are taken seriously at all, are considered by most scholars to be of questionable credibility. While this lighthearted statement adds sorely needed humor to an otherwise tense situation, when I say that he clings to libertinism like a drowning man clings to a life preserver, this does not, I repeat, does not mean that you and I are inferior to self-satisfied autocrats. This is a common fallacy held by obstreperous, dirty nincompoops. In conclusion, let me just say that this is where the rubber hits the road.[/quote']

 

Let's start this letter with a little quiz:

 

1. Why can't we all just get along?

2. What meaningless self-inflicted psychological trauma is Humpy going through now?

3. Essay: Compare and contrast Humpy's reinterpretations of historic events to those of libidinous heretics, focusing especially on who is more likely to teach the next generation how to hate -- and whom to hate.

 

Don't worry; I'll give you all the answers throughout the course of this letter as well as a wealth of other information about Humpy. You see, I indisputably believe that Humpy has no idea what he's doing. And because of that belief, I'm going to throw politeness and inoffensiveness to the winds. In this letter, I'm going to be as rude and crude as I know how, to reinforce the point that if the people generally are relying on false information sown by putrid curmudgeons (especially the footling type), then correcting that situation becomes a priority for the defense of our nation.

 

Humpy's insinuations are a mere cavil, a mere scarecrow, one of the last shifts of a desperate and dying cause. The real question here is not, "Whatever happened to Humpy's sense of humanity?". The real question is rather, "How can Humpy open the floodgates of absenteeism and then turn around and shed tears for those who got hurt as a result?" If you need help in answering that question, you may note that if you can make any sense out his predatory precepts, then you must have gotten higher marks in school than I did.

 

If Humpy is going to make an emotional appeal, then he should also include a rational argument. Not that I ever believed his lies, but at least before they had some kind of internal consistency -- a logic, albeit twisted, that invited refutation. But now, it seems Humpy is desperately flailing about for any pretext, no matter how ludicrous or slight, to leave a large part of this country's workforce dislocated and disillusioned. He can't possibly believe that unfounded attacks on character, loads of hyperbole, and fallacious information are the best way to make a point. He's contumelious, but he's not that contumelious. To conclude, the world would be a much better place to live if Humpy just stopped trying to prevent us from getting in touch with our feelings.

your a fuckign ***got dude:gaysex2:

 

im still a :rape: ist at large!

I'm laughing so hard... However this wasn't as good as myg0t impersonating celebrities on totalbf2s and talking to each other rofl.

 

Could someone post a link to it? It was posted before.

I'm laughing so hard... However this wasn't as good as myg0t impersonating celebrities on totalbf2s and talking to each other rofl.

 

Could someone post a link to it? It was posted before.

that was good, unti l***gots starts joining in with dead celebs

Yeah lol, anyone got a link to the argument generator? Been posted before. Did google search, gave me bad results.

Yeah lol, anyone got a link to the argument generator? Been posted before. Did google search, gave me bad results.

 

This is one of them atleast: http://www.pakin.org/complaint/

While you're probably sick of hearing about Mr. Twolvesfan624, it is crucial that you read this letter. I want to share this with you because Twolvesfan624 keeps trying to deceive us into thinking that he's merely trying to make this world a better place in which to live. The purpose of this deception may be to uproot our very heritage and pave the way for his own wrongheaded value system. Or maybe the purpose is to destroy our youths' ability to relax, reflect, study, and meditate. Oh what a tangled web Twolvesfan624 weaves when first he practices to deceive. For the moment, he makes no secret of the fact that he maintains that either bad things "just happen" (i.e., they're not caused by Twolvesfan624 himself) or that Twolvesfan624 can be trusted to judge the rest of the world from a unique perch of pure wisdom. He denies any other possibility. I do not propose a supernatural solution to the problems we're having with him. Instead, I propose a practical, realistic, down-to-earth approach that requires only that I begin a course of careful, planned, and coordinated action. Twolvesfan624 had previously claimed that he had no intention to encourage every sort of indiscipline and degeneracy in the name of freedom. Of course, shortly thereafter, that's exactly what he did. Next, he denied that he would marginalize and eventually even outlaw responsible critics of apolaustic derelicts. We all know what happened then. Now, Twolvesfan624 would have us believe he'd never ever discredit and intimidate the opposition. Will he? Go figure. My view is that Twolvesfan624 keeps telling everyone within earshot that Man's eternal search for Truth is a challenge to be avoided at all costs. I'm guessing that Twolvesfan624 read that on some Web site of dubious validity. More reliable sources generally indicate that it would be wrong to imply that he is involved in some kind of conspiracy to make my worst nightmares come true. It would be wrong because his doctrines are far beyond the conspiracy stage. Not only that, but there are some basic biological realities of the world in which we live. These realities are doubtless regrettable, but they are unalterable. If Twolvesfan624 finds them intolerable and unthinkable, the only thing that I can suggest is that he try to flag down a flying saucer and take passage for some other solar system, possibly one in which the residents are oblivious to the fact that I normally prefer to listen than to speak. I would, however, like to remind Twolvesfan624 that I can guarantee the readers of this letter that it would be charitable of me not to mention that even without making an ethical argument against McCarthyism, I can show that he likes to have difficult social issues presented to him in simple, black-and-white terms. Fortunately, I am not beset by a spirit of false charity, so I will instead maintain that no one likes being attacked by irritating ratbags. Even worse, Twolvesfan624 exploits our fear of those attacks -- which he claims will evolve faster than you can say "pathologicopsychological" into biological, chemical, or nuclear attacks -- as a pretext to cause riots in the streets. If you think that's scary, then you should remember that Twolvesfan624 is trying to make bargains with the devil. His mission? To perpetuate myths that glorify antinomianism.

 

You may wonder why whenever I ponder over the meanings and implications of Twolvesfan624's sick, unrealistic anecdotes, I feel little peace. It's simply because Twolvesfan624 contends that space aliens are out to lay eggs in our innards or ooze their alien hell-slime all over us. Excuse me, but where exactly did this little factoid come from? According to his distortions, distractions, and outright deceptions, censorious rubes and dangerous thieves should rule this country. Fortunately, most of the people who are seriously interested in preserving our civilization know that the reality is that Twolvesfan624 has warned us that by the next full moon, mephitic rakes will make life less pleasant for us. If you think about it, you'll realize that Twolvesfan624's warning is a self-fulfilling prophecy in the sense that Twolvesfan624's opinion is that it's okay for him to indulge his every whim and lust without regard for anyone else or for society as a whole. Of course, opinions are like sphincters: we all have them. So let me tell you my opinion. My opinion is that I am not a robot. I am a thinking, feeling, human being. As such, I get teary-eyed whenever I see Twolvesfan624 leave helpless citizens afraid in the streets, in their jobs, and even in their homes. It makes me want to remove the misunderstanding that he has created in the minds of myriad people throughout the world, which is why I'm so eager to tell you that Twolvesfan624 claims that society is supposed to be lenient towards phlegmatic boneheads. Predictably, he cites no hard data for that claim. This is because no such data exist. In the beginning of this letter, I promised you details, but now I'm running out of space. So here's one detail to end with: I hate it when rebarbative misfits like Mr. Twolvesfan624 go on with such vigor about subjects they don't even know about.

I am writing this letter because I take issue with some of Mr. Gigabyte's roorbacks. For starters, if a cogent, logical argument entered Gigabyte's brain, no doubt a concussion would result. Gigabyte uses the word "crystallographically" without ever having taken the time to look it up in the dictionary. People who are too lazy to get their basic terms right should be ignored, not debated. His apostles are too lazy to compare, contrast, and identify the connections among different sorts of short-sighted, purblind exhibitionism. They just want to sit back, fasten their mouths on the public teats, and casually forget that I plan to condemn -- without hesitation, without remorse -- all those who obliterate our sense of identity. This is a choice I have made; your choice is up to you. But let me remind you that if Gigabyte wants to advocate gormless ideals, let him wear the opprobrium of that decision. As someone who is working hard to ensure that we survive and emerge triumphant out of the coming chaos and destruction, I must point out that Gigabyte either is or elects to be ignorant of scientific principles and methods. He even intentionally misuses scientific terminology to take us all on a totally reckless ride into the unknown. Okay, that was a facetious statement. This one is not: If one dares to criticize even a single tenet of his utterances, one is promptly condemned as vicious, grumpy, eccentric, or whatever epithet he deems most appropriate, usually without much explanation.

 

To Hell with Gigabyte! One other thing: Gigabyte asserts that going through the motions of working is the same as working. Most reasonable people, however, recognize such assertions as nothing more than baseless, if wishful, claims unsupported by concrete evidence. His intimates believe a conspiracy of vindictive primates control banking, foreign policy, and the media, but, as you know, if his plan to burn our fair cities to the ground is to be discouraged then the wisest course of action is to compile readers' remarks and suggestions and use them to lead Gigabyte out of a dream world and back to hard reality. Before we start down that road I ought to remind you that what we're involved in with him is not a game. It's the most serious possible business, and every serious person -- every person with any shred of a sense of responsibility -- must concern himself with it. Although I agree with those who insist that his backers can't defend their whinges, nevertheless, I cannot agree with the subject matter and attitude that is woven into every one of his psychotic viewpoints.

 

I honestly doubt we could beat this into Gigabyte's head, but the space remaining in this letter will not suffice even to enumerate the ways in which Gigabyte has tried to provide cover for an insensate, contemptible agenda. If he can overawe and befuddle a sufficient number of prominent individuals, then it will become virtually impossible for anyone to show principle, gumption, verve, and nerve. So let me make it clear that obstructionism has never been successful in the long run. Am I being unduly harsh for writing that? I think not. When the religious leaders in Jesus's time were wrong, Jesus denounced them in extremely harsh terms. So why shouldn't I, too, use extremely harsh terms to indicate that fatuous tightwads would be far more bearable if they didn't feature simplistic answers to complex problems? Gigabyte knows that performing an occasional act of charity will make some people forgive -- or at least overlook -- all of his overbearing excesses. My take on the matter is that I receive a great deal of correspondence from people all over the world. And one of the things that impresses me about it is the massive number of people who realize that his intimations are based on a technique I'm sure you've heard of. It's called "lying".

 

My goal is to lift the fog from Gigabyte's thinking. I might not be successful at achieving that goal, but I indeed do have to try. Although there are no formal, external validating criteria for Gigabyte's repressive, supercilious claims, I think we can safely say that what I wrote just a moment ago is not the paranoid rambling of a horny wacko. It's a fact.

 

To deny that Gigabyte seems to have trouble constructing a grammatically correct sentence is irrational nonsense and political irresponsibility. It is nonsense because society has paid a dear price for letting Gigabyte criticize other people's beliefs, fashion sense, and lifestyle. And it is irresponsible because if we're to effectively carry out our responsibilities and make a future for ourselves, we will first have to provide you with vital information which he has gone to great lengths to prevent you from discovering. Unfortunately, I can already see the response to this letter. Someone, possibly Mr. Gigabyte himself or one of his shock troops, will write a self-satisfied piece about how predaceous I am. If that's the case, then so be it. What I just wrote sorely needed to be written.

Mr. TheSickEmpire , Ph.D.'s proposed social programs have been getting a lot of undeserved attention recently. If you disagree with my claim that TheSickEmpire's standard operating procedure is to crush the will of all individuals who have expressed political and intellectual opposition to his crusades, then read no further. Sure, we could just sit back and let TheSickEmpire promote the lie of metagrobolism, but that prospect really grates on people who have any kind of common sense. One of the great mysteries of modern life is, What exactly is the principle that rationalizes his venal screeds? Although I haven't been able to concoct an acceptable answer to that question, I can suggest a tentative hypothesis. My hypothesis is that he doesn't know everything. Excuse me; that's not entirely correct. What I meant to say is that TheSickEmpire needs some serious professional help. Now that that's cleared up, I'll continue with what I was saying before, that he seems to have recently added the word "physicophysiological" to his otherwise simplistic vocabulary. I suppose TheSickEmpire intends to use big words like that to obscure the fact that everybody is probably familiar with the cliche that you probably know exactly what I mean. Well, there's a lot of truth in that cliche. TheSickEmpire has no right to be here. I mean, think about it. It scares the bejeezus out of me to know that he might boss others around sooner than you think. And here, I feel, lies a clue to the intellectual vacuum so gapingly apparent in his tirades.

 

Strictly speaking, TheSickEmpire's ideas are geared toward the continuation of social stratification under the rubric of "tradition". Funny, that was the same term that his spokesmen once used to don the mantel of priggism and confuse the catastrophic power of state fascism with the repression of an authoritarian government in our minds. TheSickEmpire's hastily mounted campaigns emphasize the formation of small units of vindictive worshippers that can avoid detection by authorities, strike quickly and disperse, and, to some extent, leave behind a legacy of perpetual indebtedness in developing countries. So what's the connection between that and TheSickEmpire's nostrums? The connection is that in a recent essay, he stated that he has a duty to conceal the facts and lie to the rest of us, under oath if necessary, perjuring himself to help disseminate the True Faith of classism. Since the arguments he made in the rest of his essay are based in part on that assumption, he should be aware that it just isn't true. Not only that, but if we take his litanies to their logical conclusion, we see that any day now, he will pit race against race, religion against religion, and country against country.

 

I am sick of our illustrious "leaders" treading on eggshells so as not to upset TheSickEmpire. Here's what I have to say to them: TheSickEmpire attracts noisome wastrels to his terrorist organization by telling them that his projects prevent smallpox. I suppose the people to whom he tells such things just want to believe lies that make them feel intellectually and spiritually superior to others. Whether or not that's the case, TheSickEmpire never stops boasting about his generous contributions to charitable causes. As far as I can tell, however, his claimed magnanimousness is thoroughly chimerical and, furthermore, we've tolerated TheSickEmpire's sordid tricks long enough. It's time to lose our patience and chill our kindness. It's time to honor our nation's glorious mosaic of cultures and ethnicities. It's time to shout to the world that there are some simple truths in this world. First, he is operating under the misguided assumption that his utterances are Holy Writ. Second, he would have us believe that spleeny used-car salesmen should be given absolute authority to introduce more restrictions on our already dwindling freedoms. And finally, he claims to be fighting for equality. What TheSickEmpire's really fighting for, however, is equality in degradation, by which I mean that TheSickEmpire cannot tolerate the world as it is. He needs to live in a world of fantasies. To be more specific, according to TheSickEmpire, he is known for his sound judgment, unerring foresight, and sagacious adaptation of means to ends. He might as well be reading tea leaves or tossing chicken bones on the floor for divination about what's true and what isn't. Maybe then TheSickEmpire would realize that a great many decent people are just as distressed as I am about his values. The facts are indisputable, the arguments are impeccable, and the consequences are undeniable. So why does he claim that taxpayers are a magic purse that never runs out of gold? After days of agonized pondering and reflection, I finally came to the conclusion that if it were up to him, schoolchildren would be taught reading, 'riting, and racism. TheSickEmpire wants nothing less than to dispense outright misinformation and flashlight-under-the-chin ghost stories, hence his repeated, almost hypnotic, insistence on the importance of his deceitful mottos. Do his deputies report as best as possible the facts and circumstances surrounding his cheeky rantings? No, that would be the correct and logical thing to do. Instead, they win support by encapsulating frustrations and directing them toward unpopular scapegoats. He says that the rest of us are an inferior group of people, fit only to be enslaved, beaten, and butchered at the whim of our betters. That is the most despicable lie I have ever heard in my entire life.

 

Each rung on the ladder of demagogism is a crisis of some kind. Each crisis supplies an excuse for TheSickEmpire to palm off our present situation as the compelling ground for worldwide favoritism. That is the standard process by which the most abhorrent social outcasts you'll ever see obstruct things. Because it's now in fashion and touches everyone's heart, TheSickEmpire's always talking about the welfare of our children. But that doesn't stop him from wanting to do the devil's work. Nor does it negate my claim that TheSickEmpire has -- not once, but several times -- been able to apotheosize aberrent hippies without anyone stopping him. How long can that go on? As long as his exploitative solutions are kept on life support. That's why we have to pull the plug on them and build a society in which people have a sense of permanence and stability, not chaos and uncertainty. If we let him displace meaningful discussion of an issue's merit or demerit with hunch and emotion, then greed, corruption, and Trotskyism will characterize the government. Oppressive measures will be directed against citizens. And lies and deceit will be the stock-in-trade of the media and educational institutions.

 

I don't have time to go into this in as much detail as I should, but TheSickEmpire's claim that the best way to serve one's country is to undermine liberty in the name of liberty is factually unsupported and politically motivated. I might add: Anyone who hasn't been living in a cave with his eyes shut and his ears plugged knows that no one can be right all of the time. That conclusion is not based on some sort of asinine philosophy or on TheSickEmpire-style mental masturbation, but on widely known and proven principles of science. These principles explain that if history follows its course, it should be evident that whatever your age, you now have only one choice. That choice is between a democratic, peace-loving regime that, you hope, may set the stage so that my next letter will begin from a new and much higher level of influence and, as the alternative, the repugnant and unruly dirigisme currently being forced upon us by TheSickEmpire. Choose carefully, because every time TheSickEmpire gets caught trying to fuel the censorship-and-intolerance crowd, he promises he'll never do so again. Subsequently, his encomiasts always jump in and explain that he really shouldn't be blamed even if he does, because, as they think, laws are meant to be broken. One of TheSickEmpire's favorite tricks is to create a problem and then to offer the solution. Naturally, it's always his solutions that grant him the freedom to turn once-flourishing neighborhoods into zones of violence, decay, and moral disregard, never the original problem. So what if TheSickEmpire hates me for pointing out that he has an almost mystical faith in alarmism? Let him hate me. I consider such hatred a mark of honor, a mark of distinction. I conclude this letter with an appropriate quote: "Deep down, Mr. TheSickEmpire , Ph.D. knows that I'm right." I believe we all know who said that, don't we?

even though you guys are complaining, know you still love each other

you're all ***gots

you're all ***gots

 

 

nope

you're all ***gots

aren't you the one who fucked your brother?

aren't you the one who fucked your brother?

 

haha if you believe that i did not copy that whole thing from off topic.com and pasted it here then yes.

i love you

you're all ***gots

 

yes

am writing this letter because I take issue with some of Prof. StonerSmurf's arguments. Let's review the errors in StonerSmurf's statements in order. First, garrulous big-mouths often prove their point by relying on untenable conjecture and unverifiable hearsay. StonerSmurf's perspective is that trees cause more pollution than automobiles do. My perspective, in contrast, is that in a rather infamous speech, StonerSmurf exclaimed that superstition is no less credible than proven scientific principles. (I edited out the rest of what he said because, well, it didn't really say anything.) This moral issue will eventually be rendered academic by the fact that he commonly appoints ineffective people to important positions. He then ensures that these people stay in those positions because that makes it easy for him to shower condescending guttersnipes with undeserved encomia. Some people think I'm exaggerating when I say that StonerSmurf is hardly the first proponent of disruptive ageism and he is unlikely to be the last. But I'm not exaggerating; if anything, I'm understating the situation.

 

Did it ever occur to StonerSmurf that I am morally and ethically opposed to his cop-outs? This isn't such an easy question to answer, but let me take a stab at it: He really shouldn't abet ethnic genocide, dictatorships, and footling exhibitionists. That's just common sense. Of course, the people who appreciate his rantings are those who eagerly root up common sense, prominently hold it out, and decry it as poison with astonishing alacrity. I have no problem with the manifestly obvious statement that we should use our words to create understanding and progress, not hatred and division. I have no problem with the idea that he simply regurgitates the empty arguments that have been fed to him over the years. And I have no problem with the special privileges occasionally granted to snotty hedonists. What I do have a problem with are his primitive manifestos. He lives for one reason and for one reason only: to spew forth ignorance and prejudice.

 

StonerSmurf shouldn't pull the levers of mercantalism and oil the gears of propagandism. That would be like asking a question at a news conference and, too angry and passionate to wait for the answer, exiting the auditorium before the response. Both of those actions disparage and ridicule our traditional heroes and role models. Let's try to understand what handing over our rights to him will really mean. It certainly won't mean that we'll be able to freely demonstrate conclusively that his sophistries are sanctimonious in their impact, unholy in their aspirations, officious in their political deviousness, and goofy in their wretched philosophies. No, it will mean witchcraft, beastliness, rape, and murder will become omnipresent in our society. It will mean a descent back into the jungle. I don't know which are worse, right-wing tyrants or left-wing tyrants. But I do know that StonerSmurf is careless with data, makes all sorts of causal interpretations of things without any real justification, has a way of combining disparate ideas that don't seem to hang together, seems to show a sort of pride in his own biases, gets into all sorts of impetuous speculation, and then makes no effort to test out his speculations -- and that's just the short list!

 

I feel that writing this letter is like celestial navigation. Before directional instruments were invented, sailors navigated the seas by fixing their compass on the North Star. But if StonerSmurf can one day create a system of hooliganism characterized by confidential files, closed courts, gag orders, and statutory immunity, then the long descent into night is sure to follow. I don't want this to sound like sour grapes, but he has, at times, called me "Pecksniffian" or "recalcitrant". Such contemptuous name-calling has passed far beyond the stage of being infantile but harmless. It has the capacity to shame my name.

 

As far as I'm concerned, if StonerSmurf continues to ignore compromise and focus solely on his personal agenda, crime will escalate as schools deteriorate, corruption increases, and quality of life plummets. This in mind, I would like to expand people's understanding of his self-righteous sermons. Still, we shouldn't jump to conclusions, even though it is a known fact that his wheelings and dealings are based on two fundamental errors. They assume that mediocrity and normalcy are ideal virtues. And they promote the mistaken idea that hanging out with supercilious spoiled brats is a wonderful, culturally enriching experience. StonerSmurf has planted his vassals everywhere. You can find them in businesses, unions, activist organizations, tax-exempt foundations, professional societies, movies, schools, churches, and so on. Not only does this subversive approach enhance StonerSmurf's ability to repeat the mistakes of the past but it also provides irrefutable evidence that to StonerSmurf's mind, every word that leaves his mouth is teeming with useful information. So that means that his words are a breath of fresh air amid our modern culture's toxic cloud of chaos, right? No, not right. The truth is that emotionalism has served as the justification for the butchering, torture, and enslavement of more people than any other "ism". That's why it's StonerSmurf's favorite; it makes it easy for him to make bargains with the devil. And that, in my view, is our real prob

 

Could someone post a link to it? It was posted before.

 

 

seconded