Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted
Nominate all articles on christianity for deletion on the basis that they are offensive to muslims
I am christian and that would be so hurtful, why would you even come up with that. Offensive to muslims, what do you have against us...
  kingme said:
I am christian and that would be so hurtful, why would you even come up with that. Offensive to muslims, what do you have against us...

 

you said you were jewish in another thread

  An4rCh1sT said:
Nominate all articles on christianity for deletion on the basis that they are offensive to muslims

 

HAY YA I LEIK THAT IDEA MEAYBE AFTER WE CAN RUN ON STREET AND PLAY BAESBAL

  Quote
sideways;376717']instead of trying to rage them, convince them to undelete the myg0t entry

kthxbai

 

Good idea - Remember though that convince does not equal rage, threaten or otherwise harass

  Quote
SUBL1ME;376738']I agree with the person above who said wikipedia is one of those things on the internet you just don't rage.

 

It is simply unpossible, all that happens is pages are revereted nigh but instantly

The best rage method for wikipedia would be developing a program that randomly crawls articles and changes one digit per page on dates.

 

After a long enough time of enough people running it in the background, they'd have ZERO reliability. 1994 becomes 1984, 1845 becomes 1849. Good shit. If it could work rapid enough, the humans trying to verify changes and correct them would have no way of keeping up.

  Quote
ataraxia;376869']The best rage method for wikipedia would be developing a program that randomly crawls articles and changes one digit per page on dates.

 

After a long enough time of enough people running it in the background, they'd have ZERO reliability. 1994 becomes 1984, 1845 becomes 1849. Good shit. If it could work rapid enough, the humans trying to verify changes and correct them would have no way of keeping up.

 

i read/herd this somewhere?

colbert report!

  tombo316 said:
wikipedia is something you just dont rage.

 

Hypocrite.

 

  Quote

I agree with the person above who said wikipedia is one of those things on the internet you just don't rage.

Wikipedia is communism and the admins are biased.

  Quote
sideways;376904']i read/herd this somewhere?

colbert report!

 

i remember that was discussed in #code, don't know who thought it up

On wikipedia i was just wondering why dont ppl delete the whole pages for famous things........

 

e.g. things that will definately get a lot of hits liek george bush, bill gates.........etc

 

And just put things like

 

"he smells of poo"

 

I really wana do it lol, but i dont wana get banned from that site as you just know if you wana know anything you just go to wikipedia as its so damn good!

  tombo316 said:
wikipedia is something you just dont rage.

 

+1, wikipedia is one of the most useful stuffs over the internet, so don't rage it.

  Quote
+1' date=' wikipedia is one of the most useful stuffs over the internet, so don't rage it.[/quote']

 

GET OUT OF HERE, you little hypocrite shit. Raging has nothing to do with whether someone deserves it or not.

  Lyth said:
On wikipedia i was just wondering why dont ppl delete the whole pages for famous things........

 

e.g. things that will definately get a lot of hits liek george bush, bill gates.........etc

 

And just put things like

 

"he smells of poo"

 

I really wana do it lol, but i dont wana get banned from that site as you just know if you wana know anything you just go to wikipedia as its so damn good!

 

The reason you can't delete whole pages is because if you had an account there and had really tinkered around with it you'd notice that there are logs of every single change made so if someone deleted the page you could just roll it back, which is nice when there are idiots like the supporters of this idea doing this to wiki.

Rage is rage. STFU with the ZOMG DONT MESS WITH WIKIPEDIA ITS NOT SOMEHTHING U MESS WIT! YOU KNOW WHY?

 

 

([myg0t]moof) wikipedia says otherwise

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.