September 13, 200618 yr Discuss your feelings about them. (F A G G O T S, that is) shaddup and go be your freemasion self... Actually, here, I'll sum up all the possibilities. Report back to your lodge asap. 1. Whatever 2. I'm gay 3. you're gay 4. kill the gays 5. don't try to make me gay 6. Thread hijack I think that covers it all.
September 13, 200618 yr a gay guy gave me directs to a concert when i was in san francisco once get his number?
September 13, 200618 yr They can do thier own thing, but I will admit that the stereo-typical gay with the thick rimmed glasses and girlie lispy accent just rages me. And one more thing: gay marriage is an aberration of the institution.
September 14, 200618 yr They can do thier own thing, but I will admit that the stereo-typical gay with the thick rimmed glasses and girlie lispy accent just rages me. And one more thing: gay marriage is an aberration of the institution. religious institution. Seperation of church and state plz? seriousl?
September 14, 200618 yr Author Here's something I don't think you understand, little boy: Where is it written in ANY government document that there be "separation of church and state"? Hint: It isnt!
September 14, 200618 yr Here's something I don't think you understand, little boy: Where is it written in ANY government document that there be "separation of church and state"? Hint: It isnt! "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof" Btw, marriage isn't even a fucking religious institution anymore. You can become legally married without a priest.
September 14, 200618 yr Author Right, but it doesn't say verbatim, "separation of church and state" like 90% of stupid Americans think it does. There's a difference between not making laws supporting or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, and the ridiculous level we've come to in America with distancing everyone from "evil" religion. Take, for example, public prayer in schools. Isn't this "the free exercise of religion" that the ACTUAL document states that Congress will not make a law prohibiting? I'm just stating the difference in context between the actual wording and the "popular phrase" of "separation of church and state" which are indeed quite different.
September 14, 200618 yr Right, but it doesn't say verbatim, "separation of church and state" like 90% of stupid Americans think it does. There's a difference between not making laws supporting or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, and the ridiculous level we've come to in America with distancing everyone from "evil" religion. Take, for example, public prayer in schools. Isn't this "the free exercise of religion" that the ACTUAL document states that Congress will not make a law prohibiting? I'm just stating the difference in context between the actual wording and the "popular phrase" of "separation of church and state" which are indeed quite different. you're right, it doesn't say it verbatum. Nor do the 10 commandments say thou shalt not kill verbatum. It still goes into our minds as that. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof" Thanks for that. Most religions today say gay marrage is forbidden. Our president tried to implement law outwright banning gay marrage, desipte the fact that many people don't give a shit if they marry. In my eyes, that's a direct violation of the above. Nevermind that it came from the document that founded our country. A 200 year old piece of paper doesn't mean anything anymore. Especially to the president.
September 15, 200618 yr Author Good thing that in a democracy, the majority USUALLy rules the day. "Many people" not giving a shit about gay marriage amounts to a MINORITY. There may be many, but MOST, by a long shot, think ***gots actually "marrying" is fucking stupid and want no part of it. I wish we could just light the ovens back up at the nazi concentration camps and burn all these ***got homos, along with your homo loving ass. ***got lover. kthxbye
September 15, 200618 yr Good thing that in a democracy, the majority USUALLy rules the day. "Many people" not giving a shit about gay marriage amounts to a MINORITY. There may be many, but MOST, by a long shot, think ***gots actually "marrying" is fucking stupid and want no part of it. I wish we could just light the ovens back up at the nazi concentration camps and burn all these ***got homos, along with your homo loving ass. ***got lover. kthxbye You're lucky that this country even allows bigoted fucks like you to even exist.
September 15, 200618 yr Author you, sir, are what we like to call around these parts "extremely raged". I win.
September 16, 200618 yr you, sir, are what we like to call around these parts "extremely raged". I win. eh? Good thing that in a democracy, the majority USUALLy rules the day. "Many people" not giving a shit about gay marriage amounts to a MINORITY. There may be many, but MOST, by a long shot, think ***gots actually "marrying" is fucking stupid and want no part of it. I wish we could just light the ovens back up at the nazi concentration camps and burn all these ***got homos, along with your homo loving ass. ***got lover. kthxbye I dunno... you seem kinda agitated yourself... Much more, it may have to be considered rage. Also, many doesn't necessacarily mean a minority. Many means in excess of one. :dunno: Why not just turn a blind eye to them, as it's more convienient for everyone then. You won't have to deal with them, and they won't care. Wait... God forbid everyone gets identical rights, weither it be white, black, man, woman, hetro, or even homosexual.
