Posted March 6, 200718 yr The April 2007 issue of Computer Games has an article on online cheating. There are quotes from me in this article along with some information about us. So be sure to check this magazine out, this issue should be in stores soon. The article is titled "Bustin Punks" and is written by Erica Van Ostrand. I will post some scans once the magazine comes out. I do believe this would be the 4th magazine article in which myg0t is mentioned by name.
March 6, 200718 yr Hopefully this will motivate us to rage harder! I like this one...and for a good reason.
March 6, 200718 yr ishbu123 said: does anyone have links to older magazine articles that mention myg0t? k thanks. on the front page you fucking idiot http://www.myg0t.com/?rage=articles
March 6, 200718 yr Glad to see the whole community finally gets the recognition it deserves, good job people! :grin:
March 6, 200718 yr Quote d3;452446']on the front page you fucking idiot http://www.myg0t.com/?rage=articles Thanks! You're so polite !
March 7, 200718 yr Quote Wilzo;452442']Hopefully this will motivate us to rage harder! I like this one...and for a good reason. agreed. adding to the list of our popularity and ads.
March 7, 200718 yr Quote OverlordQ;452607']4th mag article and those raged fucks on wikipedia dont think we're notable :) Thats what I'm trying to understand. Its probably because of the fact that if wikipedia does put it up it'd be defaced quickly by people we've raged. :)
March 7, 200718 yr I had fun reading the argument on Wiki about whether or not to re-instate the myg0t page. I can't remember who it was, but it was great b/c he raged em while still sounding sensible and presenting facts that made people want to put the page back up. Props to who ever that was ^^
March 12, 200718 yr CAPSL0CK said: Glad to see the whole community finally gets the recognition it deserves, good job people! :grin: you're a dumb ***got.
March 13, 200718 yr ishbu123 said: Yesssssss! myg0t...finally getting the notoriety we deserve!! "we"? :O_o: :O_o: :O_o:
March 25, 200718 yr Tom said: Thats what I'm trying to understand. Its probably because of the fact that if wikipedia does put it up it'd be defaced quickly by people we've raged. :) Why can't they just lock it?
