Posted May 13, 200717 yr Welcome, Just recently, I made a tutorial on how to create a sv_cheats disabler which is a client side cheat that makes the source engine think that the cheats aren't restricted by 'sv_cheats' in the memory. I made this tutorial to make people develop a certain understanding on how to use a memory editor and how to make an sv_cheat disabler. Watch Thanks for reading. Post your comments.
May 14, 200717 yr nice video, i bet this will spawn some people writing shit to do this automatically, i will probably post in this news later on.
May 15, 200717 yr Author There is, that's what the Trainer is for. It's how most hacks like this are made anyways. http://www.bkmods.eu.tt
May 15, 200717 yr can u be vac banned for it? even though its an exploit. i know that site but i never wanted to use that tranier because i am afraid i might get vac banned
May 15, 200717 yr can u be vac banned for it? even though its an exploit. i know that site but i never wanted to use that tranier because i am afraid i might get vac banned No.
May 18, 200717 yr If it patches opcodes it can be easily detected. I would suggest debug registers or breakpoint hooking to do this as it is undetectable by VAC2 for now.
May 18, 200717 yr wav;475283']If it patches opcodes it can be easily detected. I would suggest debug registers or breakpoint hooking to do this as it is undetectable by VAC2 for now. why dont you do so as an example for them wav
May 18, 200717 yr Any .dll files edited will be detected by VAC unless it has something to hide it's been changed. Personally I won't use this but am just warning all of you that there is a chance of getting banned by VAC, just like all other hacks except this could have a higher chance of being caught. Just my honest opinion.
May 19, 200717 yr SourceX;475305']why dont you do so as an example for them wav if this patches the engine and not client.dll everything is fine
May 24, 200717 yr Author You should know better. It patches the engine with the of hl2 executable memory. And NOP the opcodes which is what I did in CBBPV 1.3 makes it undetectable.
May 31, 200717 yr You should know better. It patches the engine with the of hl2 executable memory. And NOP the opcodes which is what I did in CBBPV 1.3 makes it undetectable. so its undetected right? i am god damn noob okei. !!!
June 14, 200717 yr yes - the only problem with it is you will occasionally get kicked from a server because of "error: client is using incompatible software" other than that you should be fine.
June 15, 200717 yr Author It uses the old client dll for masking. That's why. It's not recommended you use this after the update. I will release a new version anyways.
