Posted June 27, 200717 yr http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review#myg0t just thought it'd be relevant to myg0t's interests, since anyone can comment...
June 27, 200717 yr lol, already closed the request. Give it up. Wikipedia is ran by a bunch of ideologist that censor the site based on personal agendas rather then facts. The site over the last 2 years has become a huge failure as a result of this. It's basically a reflection of todays media, which is all opinion pieces and no factual news anymore.
June 27, 200717 yr Now that myg0t has another magazine review isn't that enough fucking . . . what do you call it . . . references maybe, bah I forget the word but yeh you get the point to be able to make another page. I know it's been deleted alot of times etc
June 27, 200717 yr Author Wikipedia's bias is really showing through. Don't worry, I'm going to keep pressing them until they give me a decent answer and not close a discussion without even a reason.
June 27, 200717 yr Wikipedia's bias is really showing through. Don't worry, I'm going to keep pressing them until they give me a decent answer and not close a discussion without even a reason. Use Encyclopedia Dramatica instead. myg0t is listed there!
June 27, 200717 yr Author Use Encyclopedia Dramatica instead. myg0t is listed there! I realize that, that is where I originally found myg0t in the first place. I just don't see the reason why wikipedia shouldn't have an article on it.
June 27, 200717 yr OldManPeterson;486324']lol, already closed the request. Give it up. Wikipedia is ran by a bunch of ideologist that censor the site based on personal agendas rather then facts. The site over the last 2 years has become a huge failure as a result of this. It's basically a reflection of todays media, which is all opinion pieces and no factual news anymore. Basically all correct. Wikipedia is about as unbiased as Fox News or what have you. I think the sources provided are much more than many other articles here would ever hope to obtain. If all other articles were put to this rigor, I'd estimate Wikipedia would have less than a fifth of the articles we have now. I don't see the harm in having a small stub about this group, since they are definately notable in the field of game raging. I also think it is a double standard that other DRs get by with much less evidence of notability. Well written, and the first time i've heard double standards mentioned on Wikipedia!
June 28, 200717 yr I realize that, that is where I originally found myg0t in the first place. I just don't see the reason why wikipedia shouldn't have an article on it. so that is why all these new accounts are popping up
