Posted December 26, 200717 yr And are there any private hacks with a good aimbot and speedhack? I mean any ones that you don't have to pay a ridiculous amount of money like $100 for?
December 26, 200717 yr All Liberals Are Scum 2 said: And are there any private hacks with a good aimbot and speedhack? I mean any ones that you don't have to pay a ridiculous amount of money like $100 for? you'd pay $500 for what I have.
December 27, 200717 yr Well the way VAC detects cheats is by searching for strings of code in a certain players processing which indicates that they are cheating. So if a hack is made public, has been made public or has been foreseen by steam then it can be detectable by steam. I'm not sure though so don't quote me on this.
December 29, 200717 yr There is a hack called TNP that is public and VAC2 proof and one called b0ns4i. I would recomend TNP though because it is better. Btw they are public.
December 29, 200717 yr and both are bad. If your looking for 2 cheap private hacks try Neferty(world Class Aimbot) or the FPScheats Framework v3 both are good hacks. Although I am unsure if i can post the links on here without being shot by myg0t members. but i would recomend both. FPScheats goes for 130/lifetime Neferty = 90-100?/10years
December 29, 200717 yr phuckingphreak said: Well the way VAC detects cheats is by searching for strings of code in a certain players processing which indicates that they are cheating. So if a hack is made public, has been made public or has been foreseen by steam then it can be detectable by steam. I'm not sure though so don't quote me on this. HAHAHAHAH ROFL please shut up you have no clue what you're blabbing on about
January 11, 200817 yr Yes private hacks wont get detected, if you just wont leak. You just buy a hack once and its working 4 ever, unless there are new offsets, but its rly easy to update em and they rarely update. Pm me for CS 1.6 / CS:S private hack.
January 12, 200817 yr a hack being private has absolutely NOTHING to do with its detection status. if the guy who wrote hack is a complete fucking idiot then yes he will keep it private to avoid detection. --->HOWEVER<--- almost every anti-cheat has multiple methods for detecting software that is using certain known or unknown methods of hooking/bypassing. such software is rarely signature based as someone above suggested. regarding private hacks and their reputation as well written software, i urge you to read this thread: http://forums.myg0t.com/showthread.php?p=538217 in particular, any post by myself or wav. and $100 is hardly a "ridiculous" amount of money, unless you live at home and are still in school? i'm guessing that's the case, if so, you have no business being picky, use free shit or don't complain. p.s. ignore tentacruel he is an idiot and i am debating banning him for spreading trojans around the forum.
