actually, the SAS and the SBS are the best trained spec forces in the world, they get more 'hands on' training, like getting sent to the jungle for weeks surviving on their own carrying out missons etc.

 

the only difference is, instead of using them as soldier, like delta for instance, they are used for recon and demolitions etc, we dont send them to do a job, just to make it a fuck load easier. for example, scud hunting in the first gulf war.

 

but you're right about shipping us suppies and stuff, but i wouldnt say that you saved us, id say that hitlers stupidity saved us, he missed so many easy oppertunitys to take us over.

 

USA won WW2, there is no question. UK played no part in it except holding off Hitler (which they did well, but defense doesn't win wars). I mean, Russia played a bigger role than the UK in WW2.

 

Best trained is an ambiguous term because it implies that you've met and fought the SAS, SBS, SEALS, Rangers, Delta, FBI, CIA, and NSA. You haven't, so anything you say that they're the best is nationalist idiocity at its best.

 

WW2 was in the 40's. What year is it now? You know what else UK used to pwn back then? Yeah, they used to be a huge thing called an "empire" until the USA showed everyone they were pussies.

 

And who really cares about how many of you faggots we killed, you're British.

It's funny the canadians are whining about the US killing their troops. It's not like they did anything anyways. The US cleared everything with tanks and everyone else just followed with little resistance.

ww2, Uk beat german navy literally single handed but just boats from usa, we beat the germans in africa and if they had africa they had a unlimited oil supply, we were first in japan and had been fighting without our code breakers at bletchley park u had no fucking chance we even sent russians intelligence at the battle of the kursk as we knew the panzer divisions positions, they broke almost every code possible, the battle of britain we completely owned them in the air, and if u forget if we lost uk to germans where the fuck wud the americans launch a attack, they wudnt have no bases except a few ships vulnerable as ur air force wudve been useless, also our sas were behind enemy lines destroying alot and pissing off italians and germans, the codebreakers were most important as the germans probly cudda got a stronghold against america navy easily, without the codebreakers as the ships wudda got thru britain destroyed us and go onto u as the kriegesmarine shud have easily defeated uk but didnt and got raped, oh ye am i also forgetting sas troops were in russia and then america enters d day where theres very similar amount of uk troops, then we are basically the same all the way through europe to the end of war and u managed to sustain a casuallty rate about a 2 thirds of ours in taht small time and russia did alot but it was all up there and u only see it as alot as they had a retarded leader who got them fucked badly and if any1 else eg eisenhower as a army leader there wudda been shitall casualties

and the main reason the war was wrong was because of hitlers stupidity

 

 

 

http://server6.uploadit.org/files/schutzstaffel-rfkca.JPG

ww2, Uk beat german navy literally single handed but just boats from usa, we beat the germans in africa and if they had africa they had a unlimited oil supply, we were first in japan and had been fighting without our code breakers at bletchley park u had no fucking chance we even sent russians intelligence at the battle of the kursk as we knew the panzer divisions positions, they broke almost every code possible, the battle of britain we completely owned them in the air, and if u forget if we lost uk to germans where the fuck wud the americans launch a attack, they wudnt have no bases except a few ships vulnerable as ur air force wudve been useless, also our sas were behind enemy lines destroying alot and pissing off italians and germans, the codebreakers were most important as the germans probly cudda got a stronghold against america navy easily, without the codebreakers as the ships wudda got thru britain destroyed us and go onto u as the kriegesmarine shud have easily defeated uk but didnt and got raped, oh ye am i also forgetting sas troops were in russia and then america enters d day where theres very similar amount of uk troops, then we are basically the same all the way through europe to the end of war and u managed to sustain a casuallty rate about a 2 thirds of ours in taht small time and russia did alot but it was all up there and u only see it as alot as they had a retarded leader who got them fucked badly and if any1 else eg eisenhower as a army leader there wudda been shitall casualties

and the main reason the war was wrong was because of hitlers stupidity

 

 

 

http://server6.uploadit.org/files/schutzstaffel-rfkca.JPG

 

More often than not, you didn't break the code. And you stated the only importance of the UK in the war: held off Hitler, destroyed the German navy (with US help and inventions), and acted as a staging ground for the invasion. Other than that you did nothing. USA brought the technology. USA brought the equipment. USA brought the troops that were optimistic. USA brought the hammer down, UK and Russia were just the anvil.

 

The importance of the Soviet Union is not that they had a lot of people but that they were the first to repel both the Germans and, consequently, the blitzkrieg. The Soviet Union contributed three things to the war: manpower, resolve, and the stopping of the blitzkrieg.

 

Oh, and really WW2 involved more than Europe. What did the UK do in the Pacific? Oh, nothing? Yeah.

 

USA dropped the bomb. USA dismantled the Japanese navy's aircraft carriers singlehandled. USA took Okinawa and Iwa Jima. USA ended the war, no matter what faggot in Europe started it.

 

And if that picture is supposed to look like Bush then you should try not to squish his head next time and maybe use the marquee tool.

i think nwa wins

NWA']Only air force that can compare to the USA's is Israel's. Hard to drop napalm when you can't get into our airspace.

 

by 'our' you mean usa? this case watch a video called "september 11th".

nimrod']by 'our' you mean usa? this case watch a video called "september 11th".

 

Different things:

Inside our airspace already

vs

Flying out from an aircraft carrier

 

And F-16s don't register as commercial airliners.

b4d_k4rm4']This is the most retarded thread i've ever read.

you haven't read enough then

Look, it was a team effort! :D

 

Nah, no arguing, the SAS is THE best special forces in the world , and fucking renowned for it - even by foreign countries.....

 

why do you think, any terrorist operation in europe... the sas are always sent in to help? and not that countries special forces......

 

the sas fitness is far supreme to any, the sas skill is far to supreme to any, the sas tactics are the best - and their intelligence, as tactical soldiers - is immense -- they are unrivalled

 

Lol, i mean in the paper there was an ex SAS dude, 6"4 and he beat the shit out of 4 officers for some reason - 4 on 1, and they couldnt do nowt to him -- he kept on fighting them and pwned them - in the end (no exaggeration) 10, TEN fucking police had to get him -- this just shows what SAS soldeirs are like physically...

Lol, i mean in the paper there was an ex SAS dude, 6"4 and he beat the shit out of 4 officers for some reason - 4 on 1, and they couldnt do nowt to him -- he kept on fighting them and pwned them - in the end (no exaggeration) 10, TEN fucking police had to get him -- this just shows what SAS soldeirs are like physically...

 

should have shot him in the face. with a airplane.

dropping a bomb isnt something to be proud of, u were getting beat so u had to resolve to droppping a a bomb on them and america did alot ye, it cudda been won without them tho easily, as russia wudve broke thru, and uk wud have invaded with canadian and french if u didnt come in and that way there wud probly be less casualties , as americans wanna go in guns blazing and get shot just like in nam and in iraq wheres casualties are uber high

Nah - it was good for usa to drop the bombs, it ended the war .... and if usa had not droppped them -- they woulda had to have street fighted which would = lots of dead usa soldiers, so owning the japs with the 2 atomics was the best move to do

 

personally, i think if germany had taken uk, we would ajust a-bombed germany too, it would of happened.

 

and the french were pussies in the war, they always are, in any war and every war theyve been in -- they surrendered, without fighting shite all..... literally, without fighting.

 

maybe usa and uk just have pride to fight on - and tka eno shit

 

oh i also saw a programme called "10 days that shook the world" and the hiroshima bomb was one of them -- had everything, the making of the bomb -- how, a bomb like it had never been seen before -- and telling the pilots this etc - even had the arming of the bomb in the plane --- basically, they dropped the bomb then a timer of 60 seconds appeared (the time it would take before the bomb exploded) there was a loud screaming noise like a buzzer, then after 60 seconds.......silence.....and ACTUAL footage of the bomb going off - taken by the man who was in the end gun of the enola gay? was it..... quite moving stuff -- fkn interesting really - and scary to think, as theyre in that plane - 100,000 japs r being pwnd below

dropping a bomb isnt something to be proud of, u were getting beat so u had to resolve to droppping a a bomb on them and america did alot ye, it cudda been won without them tho easily, as russia wudve broke thru, and uk wud have invaded with canadian and french if u didnt come in and that way there wud probly be less casualties , as americans wanna go in guns blazing and get shot just like in nam and in iraq wheres casualties are uber high

You are fucking retarded. Didnt they teach you anything in school? USA dropped the a bomb because it would be less casualties because they japs would have never surrendered if we invaded them. Less casualties was the whole goal. Why would we kill our own soldiers just to get a govt to surrender when we could just drop 2 bombs and get them to surrender? Were you too busy skipping history class shooting heroin in the school bathroom or something?

when it comes to war.....who gives a shit about - "your a pussy" "your ghey" etc, your talking about peoples lives!

 

like virsu says, the japs were mad and would never surrendered so they got owned by bombs

 

even after the 1 bomb they didnt fucking surrender, that shows how gh3y they were

i agree with poo

 

 

 

 

-----------------------THREAD CLOSED-----------------------

america still rages the world because of a-bombs on japan. They always cry about it :tear:

dropping a bomb isnt something to be proud of, u were getting beat so u had to resolve to droppping a a bomb on them and america did alot ye, it cudda been won without them tho easily, as russia wudve broke thru, and uk wud have invaded with canadian and french if u didnt come in and that way there wud probly be less casualties , as americans wanna go in guns blazing and get shot just like in nam and in iraq wheres casualties are uber high

 

Idiot

 

There were three options in the Pacific war: land invasion, blockade, or drop the bomb.

 

Land invasion would have required waiting for Soviet troops so that we wouldn't have another Omaha beach on our hands. This would have split Japan into two zones, just like Germany.

 

Blockading would entail firebombing every rice field in Japan, causing the mass genocide of the entire Japanese race.

 

Dropping the bomb saved lives, end of story.

 

Look, it was a team effort! :D

 

Nah, no arguing, the SAS is THE best special forces in the world , and fucking renowned for it - even by foreign countries.....

 

why do you think, any terrorist operation in europe... the sas are always sent in to help? and not that countries special forces......

 

the sas fitness is far supreme to any, the sas skill is far to supreme to any, the sas tactics are the best - and their intelligence, as tactical soldiers - is immense -- they are unrivalled

 

Lol, i mean in the paper there was an ex SAS dude, 6"4 and he beat the shit out of 4 officers for some reason - 4 on 1, and they couldnt do nowt to him -- he kept on fighting them and pwned them - in the end (no exaggeration) 10, TEN fucking police had to get him -- this just shows what SAS soldeirs are like physically...

 

Best special forces in Europe, no doubt. However, the world is a different story. The IDF is one of the best special forces in the world, and the SAS and SBS are too. However, the USA has three of the most respected special forces teams in the world: Rangers, Berets, and the Seals. It is pointless to argue who is the best in the world because it is a matter of opinion. I won't say that the USA has the best special forces because I don't know and it would just be my nationalist side talking, just like if someone said the SAS or SBS was the best.

 

And it isn't that uncommon to see ANY ex-spook beat the shit out of 4 cops. They aren't special forces because they can't fight.

with such a heavy dependence on technology, what if that support was taken out

I know its just a game but in splinter cell when whatever country attacks the US, they take out communication lines and power sources before anything else, and the information infrastructure is severely crippled

The United States penis is bigger then the Rest-of-the-World's penis.

blocky']with such a heavy dependence on technology, what if that support was taken out

I know its just a game but in splinter cell when whatever country attacks the US, they take out communication lines and power sources before anything else, and the information infrastructure is severely crippled

Thats what they have backup systems and generators for.

The United States penis is black

blocky']with such a heavy dependence on technology, what if that support was taken out

I know its just a game but in splinter cell when whatever country attacks the US, they take out communication lines and power sources before anything else, and the information infrastructure is severely crippled

 

M16's do not rely on communication lines. Nuclear subs do not rely on powerplants. Face it, Canada would not win in a war with the USA no matter what. Your country sucks.

NWA']Face it' date=' Canada would not win in a war with the USA no matter what. Your country sucks.[/quote']

considering the fact that britain is about 20 times smaller than america and in ww2

 

Great Britain 326,000

USA 295,000

 

and britain were in the war for 2 more years and on a few more main battlefields (africa)(bob)(navy)(burma)(norway)and several sas in ussr, japan and plenty of spys all over and the death tol between us was almost the same and considering every battlefield america was on, so were we and sometimes with more troops sometimes with less and in iraq uve been raped,

and in the first few weeks of iraq uk advanced further with less military casualties than america and the death toll kept going up and up, and if britain 20times smaller are doing better

and if america wud fire a nuke at any1 they wud definitely have 10 more firing back, and none of this wud happen between usa and uk cos wed be allies but if anything happened it wud be uk and usa with eachother fighting against, hopefully europe cos the rest of it is shit

eachother fighting against' date=' hopefully europe cos the rest of it is shit[/quote']

 

agreed