is it true that the higher your post count the more likely you are to hook up with a chick ?

if your idea of a chick is named sp0rk then yes

The function is logarithmic

 

http://img395.imageshack.us/img395/630/chicksperpostke5.jpg

Edited December 15, 200816 yr by John_Winthrop
Added an explanation

  John_Winthrop said:

The function is logarithmic

 

http://img395.imageshack.us/img395/630/chicksperpostke5.jpg

 

makes perfect sense! lets go to america to start a massachusetts?

that's why my harem is full of chix

there are no numbers so at what point does your chicks platuea ?

  plasticcat said:

there are no numbers so at what point does your chicks platuea ?

 

As "post count" approaches infinity, the "number of chicks in millions" approaches a limit of e.

  John_Winthrop said:

The function is logarithmic

 

http://img395.imageshack.us/img395/630/chicksperpostke5.jpg

 

GUD CHART IS GUD!!~!

Fucking nerds up in here...the only log I wanna see is in my toilet.

Ishbu don't lie, we all know punjabs are good at math.

i am a Punjabi jatt :)

More like the higher your post count the less of a chance you have hooking up with a woman.

 

It's simple physics. E=MC^2

  Quote

Cadaver;599543']Ishbu don't lie' date=' we all know punjabs are good at math.[/quote']

 

well than you don't know me too well...I spent a whole nother year in University repeating the same math class 3 times.

the correlation coeficient r-squared shows that the value of correlation between post counts and women in millions is 0.96438

Yeah it's true.

 

this is my 2000th post I speak from experience.

  keane said:

the correlation coeficient r-squared shows that the value of correlation between post counts and women in millions is 0.96438

 

This is very good. I have also checked the residual plot to ensure that the function truly is logarithmic. Unfortunately correlation does not prove causation and thus we must perform an experiment to isolate any confounding variables and determine the true relationship between post count and chicks.:ugh:

this theory fails

  John_Winthrop said:

This is very good. I have also checked the residual plot to ensure that the function truly is logarithmic. Unfortunately correlation does not prove causation and thus we must perform an experiment to isolate any confounding variables and determine the true relationship between post count and chicks.:ugh:

 

gah! Statistics! I just finished that class!!!

  Quote

CJ;599482']if your idea of a chick is named sp0rk then yes

 

i lol'd irl k thx

  Quote

Cadaver;599543']Ishbu don't lie' date=' we all know punjabs are good at math.[/quote']

 

dont forget the chinks