Let's start the discussion with a simple fact: Everyone has had or is having sexual intercourse. This cannot be refuted. The question now should be, at what point does the average human begin sex. Well there is not one answer. Good wholesome Christians don't begin having relations until a connubial agreement has been signed in the name of the Lord. Other more liberal creatures may have relations as early as the age of 18. Overall though, it is not until the late teen years and beyond that humans begin their studies in carnal knowledge.

 

My friends, this is where us Enlightened Thinkers have begun to see a problem that affects society in truly gastronomical proportions. The time one starts to explore the "liberal arts" is also the same time one starts to enter the labor force and aid the production of his or her country's goods and services. But with all this sexual tension built up for 18 years, one's focus and concentration on industrial matters tends to wane. They are more eager to feel the divine sensations of the Glans than to attend to other important matters such as increasing their nation's GDP.

 

Here is where we have theorized a solution: encourage sexual exploration at a very early age, as early as 6 weeks old. Parents may introduce sexual sensations to their children by gently caressing their genitals whilst giving them a bath or changing their diapers. Maternal masturbation so to speak. This is not a perverse form of pedophilia because it would not gratify the parent in any means; it would just please the child. After being familiarized with these sensations, it would be appropriate to arrange sex dates with neighborhood children. Homo erotic activity not excluded, this would be a great way to encourage sexual contact without any feelings of shame or embarrassment. You see, when one is older, they have spent so many years waiting for the first moment of sex, thinking about how their partner might receive them, thinking of what to say, being concerned with the perception of their own genitalia's appearance, that before they even have sex with their partner they must spend days, even weeks, "spending time together" and becoming comfortable with each other before any penetration is seen. This wastes time. When one could be providing goods and services for the state, one is instead flirting, dating, and cuddling. However if you have babies meet naked and be allowed to freely explore each other, they will not have to waste so much time on pre-sexual experiences due to their natural naiveté and innocence.

 

If children relieve their multitude of sexual urges at 8 instead of 18, they will be less concerned with this primal instinct and be able to focus their full attention on fulfilling their patriotic productive duties.

Edited March 1, 200916 yr by John_Winthrop
Routine Maintenance

llllllllmmmmmmmmmmmmaaaaaaaaaoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

+b. Fake John_Winthrop. The real John would never spell encouragement wrong.

+b. Fake John_Winthrop. The real John would never spell encouragement wrong.

 

I understand your cause for distress, but there is reason to the rhyme. I could not fit a single letter more into the title, so I removed one that I thought would not draw attention to the average reader. You have bested me though, and hats off to you for doing so. Hopefully next time my title will fit appropriately into the text field.

i read that all

i read that all

 

Well, what did you think? Do you care to debate?

:ugh:idk

That's fine. Feel free to come back when you decide. :wiggle:

so molesting america's youth is the cure for over promiscuous behavior?

theMinkey;612646']so molesting america's youth is the cure for over promiscuous behavior?

 

Yes. It will subdue sexual urges at older ages when people need to assume responsibility

theMinkey;612646']so molesting america's youth is the cure for over promiscuous behavior?

 

shud ave consulted minkey be4 typin diz, wulda s4vd yu time

TL;DR

I'm kinda torn on this situation. It seems like it would be a good idea theoretically but just like Communism- it works well in theory but as soon as you give it to people to do they fuck it up.

 

Sure, making it so kids don't have sexual tension throughout their lives is a good idea I certainly know that growing up I was quite shy around females till around the middle of high school when I started having sex and then I was quite easy going around other girls.

 

I just don't see how you would convince parents and future parents that it's okay to mutually masturbate their children, just wouldn't work. If I was a parent too I would be extremely uncomfortable doing that too.

All I know is I was shocked when I ventured out of my normal channel level to see the names of some of the pornos available to buy ppv at the top of my tv as I am flipping through the channels. It went from like seinfeld to she likes it black. Some of the other classic favorite hits that were being offered were bj bonanza, she likes em large, bathroom raunch, amateur cherry pop, horny hockey moms, pole ridin cuties, 21 horny years old, and kinky cougar party. It doesn't bother me since I live by myself. But if I had kids, I woulda been like wtf if they asked me if they could have a kinky cougar party for their next birthday.

 

Lol I ordered one once... For 12 bucks and I couldn't even record it on my dvr. Totally not worth a 12 dollar fap when there is the internet. Although in hd, you could see their herpes sores on their genitals in amazing detail!

Edited March 2, 200916 yr by MillerTime

Well I've never had sex and I never will so I don't care about any of this.

I just don't see how you would convince parents and future parents that it's okay to mutually masturbate their children, just wouldn't work. If I was a parent too I would be extremely uncomfortable doing that too.

 

It will be hard at first, but some generation of parents will need to make the sacrifice and give in to this method. Torture, brainwashing, or other "pretty persuasions" may be necessary here.

By touching the child's genitalia or should I say MOLESTING the child I believe will either:

 

a) Arouse the child to improve the child-parent relationship

b) Arouse the child beyond the above to the point it becomes incestual and a sexual relationship is imminent

c) Startle the child in an unpleasant manner

 

None of these outcomes are suitable.

However your suggestion of introducing one's child to another neighbour's child for consensual play if I read correctly I believe is a more feasible option.

 

You don't fully understand the purpose of maternal masturbation. This is not a 'let's sit down and have sex with my baby' type of situation. Instead, it will be done at inconspicuous times such as baths and diaper changing; it is meant only to introduce the sexual sensation and have it related to other comfortable situations in the baby's mind, and is not meant to develop a sexual relationship between parent and child.

I'm kinda torn on this situation. It seems like it would be a good idea theoretically but just like Communism- it works well in theory but as soon as you give it to people to do they fuck it up.

 

Sure, making it so kids don't have sexual tension throughout their lives is a good idea I certainly know that growing up I was quite shy around females till around the middle of high school when I started having sex and then I was quite easy going around other girls.

 

I just don't see how you would convince parents and future parents that it's okay to mutually masturbate their children, just wouldn't work. If I was a parent too I would be extremely uncomfortable doing that too.

 

Capitalism is a good idea in theory...but people tend to fuck that up too. Ever heard of weekends? That was a hard-earned privilege that never used to exist. How about Unions, minimum wages, the SEC ect. Those are all anti-capitalistic ideas. Pure capitalism isn't practiced because people are assholes. So everything in theory sounds nice but just doesn't translate into our asshole society.

Capitalism is a good idea in theory...but people tend to fuck that up too. Ever heard of weekends? That was a hard-earned privilege that never used to exist. How about Unions, minimum wages, the SEC ect. Those are all anti-capitalistic ideas. Pure capitalism isn't practiced because people are assholes. So everything in theory sounds nice but just doesn't translate into our asshole society.

 

The ideal society is a mix of Capitalism and Socialism. Communal property is not a sensible idea because it would ruin fun things like personal collections, fashion, taste in food, and living location. On the other hand, Socialism has its own benefits like national health care. The important thing to remember is to never let one idea get too much of the upper hand.

I do not appreciate these long winded discussions. They are often not that interesting, fairly unrelated, and boil down to crap in the end.

 

I issue the challenge to you that you find something interesting and related to post.

I do not appreciate these long winded discussions. They are often not that interesting, fairly unrelated, and boil down to crap in the end.

 

I issue the challenge to you that you find something interesting and related to post.

 

What should my topics be related to? Also, reading other peoples' opinions is not that interesting in itself, but it is exhilarating and refreshing to post your own opinions in response.

Parents shouldn't touch their kids. It should be left up to the kids themselves what they do on their own time and with other kids. The only thing parents should do is simply talk about it with their kids. Get them a book or a video that to help them understand things. Also this kinda thing isn't really something that needs to be a concern until puberty really because prior to that there is usually no drive or desire to do any of this. Kids just want to be kids after all.

yea kids just wanna be kids

 

 

 

AND GET RAPED

 

HOOOOOOOOO YEAAAAAHHHHHH AMERICA

sp0rky;612901']Parents shouldn't touch their kids. It should be left up to the kids themselves what they do on their own time and with other kids. The only thing parents should do is simply talk about it with their kids. Get them a book or a video that to help them understand things. Also this kinda thing isn't really something that needs to be a concern until puberty really because prior to that there is usually no drive or desire to do any of this. Kids just want to be kids after all.

 

I'm not saying that society shouldn't think that this idea is wrong. Naturally, people will think that it's absurd, but that's just the way we've been conditioned to think. If we really cared about what was good for our society, then we would want to help the production of the state. My idea here is part of this concept of sacrificing the individual for the benefit of the state; when the state is benefited then the quality of life of its citizens increases. It is indeed sardonic but it is potentially a reality.

JW, this entire theory is to rid the world of the discomfort of entering a healthy sexual relationship in the late teens period?

 

Is this really a huge issue? I don't know because i started having sex when i was about 13-14 (disgracefuly young, i know), and have always felt comfortable about the whole thing.

Personally, I would imagine, even if i wasn't comfortable about sex in later life, i'd rather have the discomfort of the situation, and the very strong bond it creates with my partner than have my own mother whack me off.

 

The nervousness and discovery of the situation is important i think. Its like a rite of passage, most people have probably been there.

 

If the case is you are a 20 year old virgin, you need to man the fuck up and get out there and do it, if thats what you want so bad. I mean, mums are for feeding and clothing, not fucking...