March 11, 200520 yr Voltron']its a good thing we all live in russia where we are safe I hear the punishment is much worse on your side of the world versus America. :no:
March 11, 200520 yr HEY LETS USE TECHNICALITYS SO I DONT HAVE TO ANSWER THE QUESTION I RIGHTFULLY UNDERSTAND! IT MAKES ME LOOK COOLER! so pardon me. Prove to me that the legislative branch would actually attempt to prosecute someone for the previously mentioned incident. Faggot.OH NOES YOU CALLED HIM A FAGGOT!!! HE SI GOING TO PROSECUTE YOU NOW YOU NAUGHTY INTERNET ABUSER YOU< OMGOOSE RUN THE FBI IS AFTER YUO
March 11, 200520 yr qs2']OH NOES YOU CALLED HIM A FAGGOT!!! HE SI GOING TO PROSECUTE YOU NOW YOU NAUGHTY INTERNET ABUSER YOU< OMGOOSE RUN THE FBI IS AFTER YUO FUXXXXXX IM GOING TO JAIL :[
March 11, 200520 yr i said PROVE that they would spend the time to prosecute such incidents. Already did. That is the procedure. i.e. previously recorded cases of minute offensive language used in a chat and consequent prosecution. Oh, so you want a precedent? Why didnt you say so? :sackrider Here, research Blumenthal v. Drudge, 992 F. Supp. 44 (D.D.C. 1998). Edit: TheHatter --> You, sir, are raged. :ownedd:
March 11, 200520 yr Oh no, i'm going to get in trouble for swearing. *gasp* They'll tell me not to do it again, and i'll be on my way.
March 11, 200520 yr Already did. That is the procedure. Oh, so you want a precedent? Why didnt you say so? :sackrider Here, research Blumenthal v. Drudge, 992 F. Supp. 44 (D.D.C. 1998). Edit: TheHatter --> You, sir, are raged. :ownedd: first off, a procedure does not prove that they indeed would do so in this case. it merely proves that they could. could =\= would. Blumenthal v. Drudge involves defimation of a specific individual. No specific individuals were defamed in this incident. Merely a disruption of a public internet chat room. And i am in no way raged, just find your ignorance to insinuate that prosecution was likely in this case. And you are a faggot for doing so. Where is the rage?
March 11, 200520 yr DavidoftheEast > You :bowdown: Seriously though. David has you guys anyway you go and hes correct about it too. People on this very forum could be prosecuted. But the admins wouldn't do so, because it would only back-fire.
March 11, 200520 yr Author It is a means of communication accessable to the general public. But thats not a PLACE, so its all negated. A place is: - An area with definite or indefinite boundaries; a portion of space. - Room or space, especially adequate space: There is place for everyone at the back of the room. - The particular portion of space occupied by or allocated to a person or thing. - A building or an area set aside for a specified purpose: a place of worship. - A dwelling; a house: bought a place on the lake. - A business establishment or office. - A locality, such as a town or city: visited many places. Note that none of these definitions can be applied to the internet.
March 11, 200520 yr DavidoftheEast > You :bowdown: Seriously though. David has you guys anyway you go and hes correct about it too. People on this very forum could be prosecuted. But the admins wouldn't do so, because it would only back-fire. I'm arguing the likelyhood of individuals being prosecuted for the incidents in the chat room. So STFU firecrotch.
March 11, 200520 yr love how you guys turn a perfectly good rage thread into a thread where everyone pretends they are a lawyer and bitching about the definition of a "place." way to go.
March 11, 200520 yr I'm arguing the likelyhood of individuals being prosecuted for the incidents in the chat room. So STFU firecrotch. Firecrotch? Fuck man, thats original! Nice one.
March 11, 200520 yr I come back from the bar to see this shit still being argued? TheHatter is right that the incident reflects a specific person, but it is the likelihood of using your first Amendment rights to defamate another person or group of people that is presented. You have a right to speech just like you have a right to be free from defamation or libel. If someone is calling you a "nigger," "spic," "gook," etc and you do not like it, regardless of what form of communication it is interpreted in, then you have a right to file charges against the offender. But thats not a PLACE, so its all negated. Neither is a newspaper but libel extends its branch through there. Look, the term "place" is ambiguous. It also represents the medium of communication where the use of speech is being used. If I call you up on a phone and call your mother a "sandnigger," that is defamation. If I write in a newspaper article that you are a homosexual, that is libel. If I type up on the Internet in public chat that Chunkylover56 is a Jewbag, that is libel and harassment since it is real time. Point being: you invaded a private chat room with the pre-meditation of causing harm and did so by using profane language. There was intent and cause of harm, hence it is against the law. :drool:
March 11, 200520 yr But thats not a PLACE, so its all negated. A place is: - An area with definite or indefinite boundaries; a portion of space. - Room or space, especially adequate space: There is place for everyone at the back of the room. - The particular portion of space occupied by or allocated to a person or thing. - A building or an area set aside for a specified purpose: a place of worship. - A dwelling; a house: bought a place on the lake. - A business establishment or office. - A locality, such as a town or city: visited many places. Note that none of these definitions can be applied to the internet. teh intranet is invisible! it's a figment of our imagi|nation! it does not exist. yet when myg0t g0t dd0s, somehow our figments dissappeared!
March 11, 200520 yr I come back from the bar to see this shit still being argued? TheHatter is right that the incident reflects a specific person, but it is the likelihood of using your first Amendment rights to defamate another person or group of people that is presented. You have a right to speech just like you have a right to be free from defamation or libel. If someone is calling you a "nigger," "spic," "gook," etc and you do not like it, regardless of what form of communication it is interpreted in, then you have a right to file charges against the offender. Neither is a newspaper but libel extends its branch through there. Look, the term "place" is ambiguous. It also represents the medium of communication where the use of speech is being used. If I call you up on a phone and call your mother a "sandnigger," that is defamation. If I write in a newspaper article that you are a homosexual, that is libel. If I type up on the Internet in public chat that Chunkylover56 is a Jewbag, that is libel and harassment since it is real time. Point being: you invaded a private chat room with the pre-meditation of causing harm and did so by using profane language. There was intent and cause of harm, hence it is against the law. :drool: But those racial slander terms were not being used on certain individual's. They were being used in general population. Well, now wait... I did say "Nigger's like yourself." So that could be considered harassment. But I seriously doubt the Police are going to give a fuck that I called someone a nigger. Hell, the cop's in this city are so racist. I'm sure they'd get a good laugh out of this. Oh by the way. Did you notice most of our messages were pretty much nothing but link's to myg0t with a small comment next to them? If any Law Enforcement authority asks me. I'll just say I was advertising the site in chatrooms, and when they ask why I said "Nigger's like yourself." I'll tell them I thought it was one of those fucking Yahoo gang chats.
March 11, 200520 yr love how you guys turn a perfectly good rage thread into a thread where everyone pretends they are a lawyer and bitching about the definition of a "place." way to go. .
March 11, 200520 yr I did some rage on there, but can't be assed to post screenshots. It was a good place for fun, thanks for that Vodka.
March 11, 200520 yr In my opinion David is completely correct. However, at my university a professor wrote an essay about how the victims of 9-11 were a bunch of nazis and nothing happened to him. No lawsuit, no loss of job, nothing. Obviously a lot of people got raged.
March 11, 200520 yr I came in the chat at about 8:30 and got immediatly banned as soon as i started spamming
March 11, 200520 yr qs2']YOU ALL< FUCK OFF>/ huh< i did't spam this, but don't agree with ya neither. they all had fun in myg0t's name....isn't that what it's all about?
March 11, 200520 yr Author Neither is a newspaper but libel extends its branch through there. Look, the term "place" is ambiguous. It also represents the medium of communication where the use of speech is being used. If I call you up on a phone and call your mother a "sandnigger," that is defamation. If I write in a newspaper article that you are a homosexual, that is libel. If I type up on the Internet in public chat that Chunkylover56 is a Jewbag, that is libel and harassment since it is real time. Oh my now you're changing your story so that it's libel we're guilty of
March 11, 200520 yr why is it that 90% of admins are :sackrider :liar: :liar: :P the other 10% run places like this - or unleash trojans on the jacks that pull shit :rape:
March 12, 200520 yr haha david raged you all. nj david. rofl noone was raged. debates dont mean the involved parties are raged.
