March 11, 200520 yr before they were banning, from 3 to 3:30, some good methods used were the previously mentioned I=l method, just using SIT_ANYNAMEHERE and first acting like a sit student then advising chat guests that sit is a horrible school, sound abuse, spam changename spam changename spam changename, and other things. pretty fun while it lasted.
March 11, 200520 yr Voltron']http://img172.exs.cx/img172/8472/rofl5xp.png :bowrofl: I cannot wait till you fucktards who raged a college get fined for doing that stunt.
March 11, 200520 yr I bet the only way that would happen was if you were actually in that shitty college.
March 11, 200520 yr :bowrofl: I cannot wait till you fucktards who raged a college get fined for doing that stunt. its called a public chat you dipshit. i have never heard of someone being fined for an activity where no illegal activities were preformed.
March 11, 200520 yr its called a public chat you dipshit. i have never heard of someone being fined for an activity where no illegal activities were preformed. As I recall the chat is hosted by a university, you fucking moron.
March 11, 200520 yr As I recall the chat is hosted by a university, you fucking moron. IT IS A PUBLIC CHAT. NO ILLEGAL ACTIVITES WERE PREFORMED TO ENTER THE CHAT AND NONE WERE PREFORMED IN THE CHAT. you fucking moron.
March 11, 200520 yr IT IS A PUBLIC CHAT. NO ILLEGAL ACTIVITES WERE PREFORMED TO ENTER THE CHAT AND NONE WERE PREFORMED IN THE CHAT. Disrupting business activities is illegal.
March 11, 200520 yr Disrupting business activities is illegal. We were not disrupting buisness activities. You find me a law or information that proves we could be prosecuted for our actions, and that a judge would likely enforce the law, and I might listen to what you have to say. But you wont, so shut your fucking face.
March 11, 200520 yr Author As I recall the chat is hosted by a university, you fucking moron. No, its hosted by Parachat. http://chat.parachat.com/chat/login.html?room=#stevens_forum
March 11, 200520 yr But David, don't be fucking stupid. They're highly unlikely to get prosecuted. The cops have better things to do than go after people in chat rooms. With all the fucking murders and rapes going on, they don't have time to go after that shit. Good rage you guys.
March 11, 200520 yr We were not disrupting buisness activities. You find me a law or information that proves we could be prosecuted for our actions, and that a judge would likely enforce the law, and I might listen to what you have to say. But you wont, so shut your fucking face. Sure, here you go: http://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?cl=82&a=59 S 240.20 Disorderly conduct. A person is guilty of disorderly conduct when, with intent to cause public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm, or recklessly creating a risk thereof: 1. He engages in fighting or in violent, tumultuous or threatening behavior; or 2. He makes unreasonable noise; or 3. In a public place, he uses abusive or obscene language, or makes an obscene gesture; or 4. Without lawful authority, he disturbs any lawful assembly or meeting of persons; or 5. He obstructs vehicular or pedestrian traffic; or 6. He congregates with other persons in a public place and refuses to comply with a lawful order of the police to disperse; or 7. He creates a hazardous or physically offensive condition by any act which serves no legitimate purpose. And since this was a public chat room, Internet laws apply here. :ssex:
March 11, 200520 yr Ok David just stfu. You used to be cool and now you're just being a complete tool.
March 11, 200520 yr Ok David just stfu. You used to be cool and now you're just being a complete tool. Only playing Devil's advocate. Calm down there, you magnificently glazed doughnut. :drool2:
March 11, 200520 yr Sure, here you go: http://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?cl=82&a=59 And since this was a public chat room, Internet laws apply here. :ssex:wrong. freedom of speech.
March 11, 200520 yr Sure, here you go: http://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?cl=82&a=59 And since this was a public chat room, Internet laws apply here. :ssex: I also said proof that a judge would bother to prosecute and enforce said laws. For that to happen it would include gathering IP's and locating specific individuals, connecting them to their actions in the chat, and prosecuting them. Would never happen. So again, shut the fuck up faggot.
March 11, 200520 yr qs2']wrong. freedom of speech. Freedom of speech is forfeited when a person is a) inciting violent remarks to a person or a group or b) is displaying lewd activity that is prohibited by State statutes or community law or c) using hateful terms against a minority group Comments that were made included "niggers" used in a derogatory term, hence your first Amendment rights are revoked. Edit: I also said proof that a judge would bother to prosecute and enforce said laws. Judges only rule on decisions, but they do not initially prosecute people. That is for the legislative branch to do.
March 11, 200520 yr so wait, you're telling me that if you used derogatory language toward someone in this very forum, they could have you prosecuted.
March 11, 200520 yr Judges only rule on decisions, but they do not initially prosecute people. That is for the legislative branch to do. HEY LETS USE TECHNICALITYS SO I DONT HAVE TO ANSWER THE QUESTION I RIGHTFULLY UNDERSTAND! IT MAKES ME LOOK COOLER! so pardon me. Prove to me that the legislative branch would actually attempt to prosecute someone for the previously mentioned incident. Faggot.
March 11, 200520 yr Internet isn't a "place". It is a means of communication accessable to the general public. we only displayed lewl activity :bowrofl: so wait, you're telling me that if you used derogatory language toward someone in this very forum, they could have you prosecuted. Technically yes. If the Forum admins wanted to report you for harassment to Internet securities bureaus they may, but that is only in aggregious cases. Very few decide to since most forums are common interest forums for the youth rather than business/professional discussion forums. Prove to me that the legislative branch would actually attempt to prosecute someone for the previously mentioned incident. Faggot. College reports users for their conduct in the channel. Their IPs are reported and an incident report is filed. Depending on how severe the case is, the offender(s) may be given a money damages fee or a small misdemeanor.
March 11, 200520 yr College reports users for their conduct in the channel. Their IPs are reported and an incident report is filed. Depending on how severe the case is, the offender(s) may be given a money damages fee or a small misdemeanor. i said PROVE that they would spend the time to prosecute such incidents. i.e. previously recorded cases of minute offensive language used in a chat and consequent prosecution. you need to stfu sir. k? k! Ultimatly there's a 0.0000001% chance of them even doing so.
